Find a Lawyer That’s Right For Your Case

The legal field has been evolving since the days of Hammurab,i a Babylonian emperor who lived during the 18th century B.C. established the first legal code in recorded history. In the nearly 4,000 years since, the field of law has become a whole lot more complicated. As a result, it can be a real challenge to find a lawyer who is right for your case. As it is with medicine, so it is in law; there are many, many different specialties.

The divorce attorney

With the increased recognition of women’s rights and value of contributions to the family and household, laws protecting women and children have become much more complex than in the past. “Marriage is grand, divorce is twenty grand,” as the old joke goes – and you’ll need a good divorce attorney to protect your interests.

A divorce attorney is a specialist in family law. This is an area of the law that defines the rights and responsibilities of parents toward their children and toward each other. Granted, a divorce is much simpler when there are no children involved, but the property division issues can be acrimonious, especially if the woman made substantial contributions. A lawyer referral can lead you to the right attorney for cases like these.

The personal injury attorney

If you have been whacked by some bimbo driving an SUV with a load of screaming kids, her cel phone glued to her face and a latte in one hand, you’ll want to consult a personal injury attorney. This is a lawyer who specializes in the field of torts, or personal injury issues. If your attorney primarily works with you on contracts and business issues, s/he may make a lawyer referral to a personal injury attorney in order to make sure your rights are protected and that the party who injured you and the insurer that’s supposed to be covering do the right thing.

Options

These are just two of the more common legal areas for which people must find a lawyer, but an attorney search will show you that there are many more. Your best options are the Yellow Pages or the Internet. The latter is actually one of the most effective ways to conduct an attorney search; simply entering your legal problem and your location into your favorite search engine should return several hundred results.

Source: http://www.articleheaven.com/article_552784_18.html

However, before getting started on your case, it pays to sort out information about personal injures claims. Here are common myths surrounding the matter and the facts to match each misstatement:

1. Myth: You have to go to court to win compensation.

Fact: You do not necessarily have to go to court to obtain compensation. Most personal injury claims are settled out of court even before litigation. Insurance companies find it cheaper to settle amicably than spend money on delays and costs.

2. Myth: Compensation claims are complex and time consuming.

Fact: Personal injury claims only becomes complicated in cases where liability is an issue. Compensation claims are often settled within a maximum of 12 months. Claims that are more complex are those that involve liability issues and disputes or those wherein a serious injury occurred. However, generally, with the help of a competent personal injury lawyer, delays and hassles are minimized.

3. Myth: Insurance companies will treat you fairly and you do not need a lawyer in the negotiation.

Fact: Most insurance companies will try to save costs by negotiating for a lower claim. Without the assistance of a lawyer, you might end up getting unfair compensation.

4. Myth: Compensation claim is a fortune in easy money.

Fact: Contrary to the belief of many, you will get only as much compensation as the amount that will be negotiated on during settlement. More often, your compensation will depend on your economic and non-economic damages such pain and suffering.

5. Myth: Claims promote a “compensation culture”.

Fact: This is untrue. Some people say that pursuing claims promotes a culture where people would claim for absolutely anything just to get money. Genuine persons with legitimate cause to pursue a claim will actually recover damages.

6. Myth: Claiming against an employer will lead you to losing your job.

Fact: The law protects workers in this situation. If you had an accident at work, you have all the right to claim for injury or damages. Many people injured at work fail to pursue claims for fear of losing their job. However, most employers will not recommend firing you because you asked for a claim to your injury.

7. Myth: You cannot obtain treatment while in the process of pursuing your claim.

Fact: This is untrue. You can have all the means to be treated and rehabilitated. Most insurance companies make prior arrangements to treat injured parties in key stages of the recovery.

8. Myth: The law favors only big companies and large employers; you will lose your claim against them.

Fact: This is untrue. The federal and state governments have laws to guarantee the safety of individuals. Any violations against these laws will have a corresponding penalty, whether from an individual or an entity. The law protects both the individual and the organization.

In most cases, it would be best for you to get the services of a lawyer in pursuing your claim. The skills and experience of a knowledgeable personal injury lawyer will improve your chances of attaining your goals.

Seek competent LA County personal injury services with the help of California Attorney Services.

Source: ArticleTrader.com

But one thing is a certainty whatever case is being dealt with: the amount of cash that the claimant could receive has to be maximized. This truism has recently been dealt a blow by new research claiming to show that insurers are often pressurizing claimants to take an early, lower payout.

The trade union Unite has been on the forefront of a battle against outside influences directly contacting the claimants before they have had a chance to consult with independent legal advice: a practise known in the industry as ‘third-party capture’. One insurance company, Zurich, offered a claimant £4,000 in ‘full and final settlement’ only for the case to be settled later for £35,000. In another case, recently bereaved parents – they’d lost all three of their children in a road traffic accident – were offered £21,000 by Dublin-based insurance firm Quinn Direct. The case was eventually settled for £60,000. The reckless and cutthroat tactics used by the insurance companies knows no bounds: the day after suffering whiplash by being rammed by a learner driver, a woman from Stockport was contacted by a representative from Quinn, who offered her a hire car if she agreed to make a claim within the next six months.

She claims not to have been aware that she was actually waiving her legal right to make a claim for compensation. Whilst her lawyer Jason London, a partner at Leeds based law firm Morrish, has advised her that the waiver is not legally effective in the courts of law, he is still clearly outraged by the matter: “A considerable amount of pressure was put on my client. Visiting an accident victim’s house in the aftermath of a car crash is clearly outrageous”.

The case has even gone as far as the Financial Standards Authority. A spokesman has said that they are continuing to investigate just how much customers are affected by the practices of the insurance companies, and will be looking into the dynamics of how the companies work with the clients in order to better appraise the situation. Graham Goddard, the deputy general secretary of Unite, thinks that the case is already closed. “We have given the FSA compelling evidence” he said. “Accident victims lose out because if they aren’t receiving truly independent advice, they don’t know the true value of the claims”.

Whilst Norwich Union thinks that around 70% of personal injury claims are straightforward enough not to require specialist independent legal advice, the cases looked at above demonstrate that the differences could be huge. If claiming for an injury, it’s probably best to err on the side of caution and get some unbiased help. It may cost initially, but the benefits garnered later on could be priceless.

Jack is an author of several articles pertaining to No Win No Fee, Compensation Claims, Personal Injury Claims and other legal articles.

Article Source: http://EzineArticles.com/?expert=Jack_Harriss

The cruise ship accident claim is not simple in many cases because there are different laws that apply to ships and the cruise line that owns the ship because the accident did not occur on land.

There are some cruise ship lines that when the fine print is read if you have a claim against them and you live in Sacramento you have no problem pursuing your case, but if you live in Houston, the only place that this cruise ship company can be sued is in the state of California. These cruise ship companies thrive on the fact that a passenger who is injured on one of their cruise ships will not realize there are attorneys that specialize in cruise ship accidents and will assist the injured passenger in recovering damages against the company.

There are many types of accidents that occur on a cruise line that many passengers never consider will happen to them, there are slip and fall accidents are among the accidents that occur most often.

The problem with this type of accident is that while some injuries might be apparent at the time of the accident others might not be, when a person slips and falls they can do irreparable damage to their back.

The cruise ship accident claim is not simple, because one of the largest problems with this is that many cruise ships are not equipped to handle much more than applying a band aid, many do not have x-ray equipment. This means that the passenger has little recourse to be medically treated until they have returned from their cruise.

This is a type of law that can be confusing and only an attorney who understands the laws that apply to cruise ships even for the injured victim who lives in Sacramento, including maritime laws and foreign laws. This is a part of the law that only the expert and experienced cruise ship attorney understands and it takes this expertise to build a case against the cruise line company who has their own attorneys. It is their attorneys job to ensure that there is either not a payout or if there is it is the smallest amount possible.

The experienced personal injury attorney that specializes in cruise ship accidents is aggressive and uses experts to build a solid case so they are prepared to deal with the company attorneys and recover the proper settlement for the injured passenger.

If you have been involved in a crime on a cruise ship such as being raped by a cruise ship employee, requiring experienced Los Angeles cruise liner accident lawyers, or just need a Los Angeles personal injury lawyer for another problem, there are cruise ship accident attorneys throughout California easily found by doing an internet natural language search. Article Source: http://EzineArticles.com/?expert=Michael_Ehline

The construction industry puts the bodies of its workers under great strain and exposes them to many potential health risks. There are a number of accidents that can happen in the construction industry due to a number of aspects such as faulty equipment, no matter how much or less they are damaged, at the first sign of wear and tear they should stop being used for safety reasons as they run the risk of causing a construction accident. As well as damaged equipment there is also the risk of scaffolding collapsing and people having falls from ladders or safety harnesses breaking. Another potential construction accident could be the fall from a roof.

Research shows that 71 people died between 2002 and 2003 within the construction industry due to aspects such as the ones mentioned above. In order to stop these deaths and injuries from occurring the Health and Safety Executive (HSE) are responsible for enforcing safety regulations in the UK. It is also the responsibility of your employer to ensure that the workplace is safe but this only works with the cooperation of all the tradesmen and staff on a construction site. It is an employee’s responsibility to report any defects in the workplace or on any of the equipment that is being used.

Without the correct health and safety in a construction site accidents will happen and these accidents could result in severe injuries such as broken/fractured bones, head and neck injury, torn muscles/ligaments, back injury, spinal cord damage and many more.

If you are a tradesmen working actively on a construction site it is essential that if you feel at any moment that you are not fully trained in what you are meant to be doing or if the equipment that you are using is faulty it is important that you inform your employer straight away so that the problem can be resolved before any serious damage occurs.

If you have been injured whilst working on a construction site then you could be entitled to put a claim in for compensation. If the injuries that are currently suffering or the injuries that you have suffered in the past three years have meant that you are restricted from performing your daily activities or if they have meant that you are out of work then you could be entitled to compensation to cover your initial injuries as well as any loss of earnings you have suffered and any medical expenses that you have encountered.

For more information about claiming for compensation after a construction accident that should have been avoided contact a no win no fee solicitor and they will guide you through the compensation process.

Helen is the web master of Accident Consult, specialists in all aspects of Constructions Accidents and Workplace Accidents.

Article Source: http://EzineArticles.com/?expert=Helen_Cox

It is the responsibility of your employer to ensure that the workplace is safe and free from hazards. It is also the responsibility of your employer to ensure that employees have received the correct amount of training; however as an employee if you feel that you haven’t received sufficient training for the job that you are doing or if any of the equipment that you are using is faulty/worn you must report it to your employer straight away so that the necessary action can be taken to improve the safety of the workplace.

If the worst does happen and an accident does happen in the workplace then your employer has a legal obligation to report certain accidents and incidents. Your employer must report serious work-related accidents, diseases and dangerous incidents to the Incident Contact Centre of the Health and Safety Executive (HSE), or in Northern Ireland the Health and Safety Executive for Northern Ireland (HSENI).

It is essential that your employer reports the following:

• Death

• Major injuries (for example, a broken arm or ribs)

• Dangerous incidents (for example, the collapse of scaffolding, people overcome by gas)

• Any other injury that stops an employee from doing their normal work for more than three days

• Disease

As well as reporting any serious accidents or incidents you employer must also provide the company with an accident book, which is required by law if a business has more than ten employees. If however there is no accident book and no one has made a note of the incident then it is important that you advise your employer to put what happened into writing, detailing the full circumstances of the accident and the injuries that were sustained.

In order to reduce the amount of accidents that are caused due to incorrect safety procedures it is important that all employers are provided with the correct safety wear such as goggles, hard hats, ear defenders, dust masks, safety gloves, safety boots or high-visibility jackets as well as being shown how to lift heavy objects in a safe way.

If you have had an accident at work it is important that you get any injuries checked by a health professional and that you record details of your injuries to your employer.

Helen is the web master of Accident Consult, specialists in all aspects of Workplace Accidents.

Article Source: http://EzineArticles.com/?expert=Helen_Cox

Indeed the FSA has just recently been given a dossier of evidence against unscrupulous insurers by Trade unions and claimant lawyers. Their concern regards the behavior of said insurers who deal directly with accident victims and the allegations that they are putting pressure on victims to waive their right to compensation or to settle claims for a lesser amount that they actually should.

This pressure and behavior is known in the industry as ‘third-party capture’ whereby insurers try to settle the claims of injured people before they had the chance to take independent legal advice. The trade union, Unite, included a case in the dossier where where insurance company Zurich offered £4,000 in ‘full and final settlement’, only for the case to be settled last November for £35,000.

Also in the dossier are findings by The Association of Personal Injury Lawyers’ (Apil) and amongst their more worrying cases is one in particular- where a claim on behalf of bereaved parents who lost their three children in a road traffic accident was settled last year for £60,00 but was originally offered to be settled by Quinn Direct for £21,000.

Unite and Apil are but only two companies that have expressed concern in the dossier about insurance company representatives’ cold-calling ‘third-party’ victims after an accident. In some cases, the representatives go a step further and even visit an accident victim’s house in the aftermath of a car crash. Insurance companies however will rebut the allegations by claiming that their services are designed to be proactive which would mean getting in contact with potential claimants as soon as possible after an accident. Clearly however, going one step beyond and urging settlement as soon as possible without thorough legal advice is unacceptable.

In light of the dossier, the FSA will have to decide if accident victims are truly losing out and the evidence seems to suggest that they are. Unite in particular has provided cases where victims do not know the true value of the claims and that they are being told they do not have a good case when in fact they do.

The entire investigation may prove to be a vicious circle with the insurance industry raising its hands to practicing ‘third-party capture’ on a frequent basis, but only as part of a logical business model. In their defense, the pro-active response is simply a way to address escalating costs of processing claims. They are in effect bypassing the expensive intermediary-the lawyer.

Saurav is an author of several articles pertaining to No Win No Fee, Compensation Claims, Personal Injury Claims and other legal articles.

Article Source: http://EzineArticles.com/?expert=Saurav_Dutt

They feel that many claimants are not receiving damages in accordance with the pain and stress they have experienced. The government are aware of this as they have discussed the need for new legislation almost a decade ago, but have not acted.

The APIL want to put pressure on the government to pay real attention to a pressing issue which is all too often overlooked. Law commission proposals were issued which aimed to raise the compensation awarded to personal injury victims.

Pain, suffering and loss of amenity were all to be addressed and the levels of compensation increased. It is a complex area where experts have to agree on a monetary value that the suffering translates to.

What does seem clear is that experts in the Association for Personal Injury Lawyers are agreed that compensation needs to be higher.

Martin Bare, president of the Association for Personal Injury Lawyers Association launched this attack on the governments failure to deliver:

“The law commission said in 1999 that if its recommendations were not implemented by the judiciary within three years, they should be implemented through legislation. The following year, the Court of Appeal said Parliament was the forum for such change, yet the government has said this is an issue for the courts. It is surely time this issue was settled and I appeal to the Government to provide real leadership in this issue which is of such profound importance to injured people.”

The Association of Personal Injury Lawyers has come under criticism as their membership is almost exclusively made up of personal injury lawyers. In defense Mr Bare points out the close interaction with thousands of personal injury victims that the members have between them.

Most are lawyers who have been working with victims of personal injury for many years and this close relationship with victims gives them the right to be the voice of these victims.

He says that “victims of personal injury need a voice” and goes on to impress that the lawyers in the Association for Personal Injury Lawyers will be that voice.

As well as calling for government recognition for the need for higher damages, The APIL feel that more discussion is needed on a number of personal injury matters. Mr Bare encourages more debate on health, safety, negligence and compensation, believing that this will bring about a safer environment for the public and workers.

Employers and others responsible for areas of public use will not get away with sloppy health and safety attitudes. He says that risk assessment is the cornerstone of modern health and safety law.

Carys is an author of several articles pertaining to No Win No Fee, Compensation Claims, Personal Injury Claims and other legal articles.

Article Source: http://EzineArticles.com/?expert=Carys_Robshaw