Believe it or not there are 26,459 active, resident practicing attorneys in Georgia. How do you choose the one that best fits your situation? It can be overwhelming to say the least. Please note: the below suggestions constitute my opinions only. I have been plaintiff’s litigation legal assistant specializing in cases of catastrophic injury and wrongful death involving aviation accidents, automotive and general products liability, car, truck, and construction accidents, medical malpractice, and premises liability for over 18 years. I have seen the good, the bad and the ugly. Below are my suggestions for finding the attorney best suited for you.

• Ask your relatives, friends, and business colleagues for a reference. Needless to say, if they will recommend an attorney they have used, then they were satisfied with the services provided.
• Do you have a friend or relative in the legal profession? Of the 26,000 attorneys listed as active in Georgia, they have staff. Chances are you have a friend, neighbor or relative who is associated with the legal profession. Ask who they would choose if they needed an attorney.
• Contact your local bar association. This could be on the city or state level. Although the attorneys who are listed as members pay a fee to be on the referral list, they must adhere to strict ethical standards and must be in good standing with the state bar.
• Finally, shop around. There is no limit to the number of attorneys you can interview prior to choosing one. I recommend contacting and meeting with at least 3 prior to making a decision.

Occupation: Litigation Support Services
• Extensive, well-rounded background with legal, banking and business firms for over 20 years • Expert knowledge of MS Office Suite, Windows XP, QuickBooks, Real Legal Binder, Acrobat Pro • Typing speed 75+ wpm • Bookkeeping experience • Excellent organizational skills • Working knowledge of rules of civil procedure and local rules of Georgia civil and USDC courts • Familiarity with court forms and procedures • Ability to write clearly and concisely • Ability to manage time and resources efficiently • Ability to multitask and reprioritize throughout the day • Confidentiality Guaranteed • Notary Public
http://www.deponex.com

Source: http://www.articleheaven.com/article_552035_18.html

There are many benefits to mediation and qualities that make the process work, these are a few of the key ideas that allow for successful mediation.

• It is voluntary, meaning that at any time you can leave the process with or without a reason.

• It is a collaborative process, it encourages two parties to work together to come to the best agreement that will satisfy both sides.

• You have the control to approve or disapprove decisions that are being made, there is a veto party that each party has to ensure each provision is acceptable.

• Mediation is confidential to the extent that the two parties agree upon. Only with a signed and finalized mediation agreement can confidentiality statutes be laid out and enforced to potential courts.

• Informed negotiation takes place in mediation, meaning you are able to obtain and incorporate legal and expert advice.

• Mediators remain neutral, partial and balanced to avoid any coercion or intimidation.

• Mediation can be a very self responsible and satisfying, knowing that agreements can be made through this process.

Parties with a legal dispute need to locate a qualified professional to assist them in negotiating a fair resolution to their case, mediation for your legal dispute with a company such as the National Arbitration Forum is an option to help resolve existing and potential lawsuits.

Most importantly, using mediation saves money. Mediation can help people save a lot of money compared to the bills that they might rack up through litigation cases, on average mediation can allow for a cost-savings of up to 85%. (Source: “Using ADR in Supply Chain Disputes” (September 2004))

About Author

Christina Doucet is part of the National Arbitration Forum, a neutral administrator of arbitration, mediation and other forms of alternative dispute resolution (ADR) worldwide. For more information about mediation solutions visit http://www.mediation-solution.com/mediation-defined.htm.

Source: ArticleTrader.com

Problems arise where spouses, partners, and other family members disagree about what’s the proper course of treatment to take to preserve or terminate life. In the most complicated scenarios where everyone is an emotionally bankrupt, these disagreements wind up in court, where a judge, who usually has little medical knowledge and no familiarity with you is called upon to decide the future of your treatment and possibly the termination of your life. Such legal battles are extremely costly, time-consuming and cause undue pain to those involved. In a worse case scenario, if a medical emergency arises it could cost you your life. TERRI SCHIAVO CASE RUNS THROUGH ENDLESS APPEALS, LAWSUITS AND DENIALS

Without An Advanced Healthcare Directive, if unmarried, common-law will have no legal authority to make any healthcare decisions for you. Even when you’re married, the parents may have more legal authority than your spouse. In the Florida Theresa Marie “Terri” Schiavo case (December 3,1963 to March 31, 2005) a legal battle between the wishes of her husband and her parents involved 14 appeals, numerous motions, petitions and hearings in the Florida courts, 5 suits in Federal District Court, a Congressional subpoena, state of Florida legislation, and 4 denials of certiorari from the Supreme Court of the United States, all of which could been avoided with an Advance Medical Directive.

Under the law, you can legally authorize your named Agent, whether spouse or common-law or anyone else, with written instructions through an Advance Medical Directive applicable to a wide range of health care decisions and not just “end-of-life decisions.”

WHAT IF YOU ALREADY HAVE A LIVING WILL? IS A LIVING WILL ENOUGH?

Most boilerplate healthcare powers of attorney, healthcare proxy, living will, etc. generally express sentiments about wanting treatments that serve only to prolong the dying process but absolutely no intervention to prolong life. Hospital proxies generally are written to protect the hospital’s financial interests and to limit their potential liability but not yours. Most standardized living wills fall short, limited to what they can accomplish, lacking capacity about day-to-day care, placement options, treatment options and interventions to implement precise treatments to give you, the patient, any chance of recovery.

HOW THE ADVANCED MEDICAL HEALTHCARE DIRECTIVE IS BETTER THAN A LIVING WILL

Healthcare directives can intimately respond to the actual facts and variables known when an actual healthcare decision needs to be made. Your legal decision maker under Advanced Healthcare Directives is also your spokesperson, your analyzer, your interpreter, your advocate with intimate knowledge about you, your wishes, and your values often under the most complicated circumstances fate has placed both you and your partner.

Advanced Healthcare Directives are more precise than most boilerplate instructions. An Advanced Medical Directive should be one of your key estate planning tools, together with a Financial Directive which I discuss in a separate article.

WHEN THE ADVANCED HEALTHCARE DIRECTIVE IS EFFECTIVE IN MEDICAL CARE

Advanced Healthcare Directives are legally binding in most of the 50 states, with exclusive power to act in your stead. An Advanced Medical Directive becomes effective when:

1. You cannot communicate your own wishes for your medical care:

A. Orally, B. In writing, or C. Through gestures, and

2. You are diagnosed to be close to death from a terminal condition, or to be permanently comatose, and

3. The medical personnel attending to your care are notified of your written directions.

Author bio – Rocco Beatrice, CPA, MST, MBA
Award-winning estate planning & trust expert
MS – Taxation, Master of Science Taxation
MBA – Management / Taxation
BSBA – Management / Accounting
CPA – Certified Public Accountant
—–
Irrevocable Trust Asset Protection, Medicaid Asset Protection—–Life Saving Advanced Medical Directive
71 Commercial Street #150, Boston, MA 02109 tel: +1.508.429.0011 fax: +1.508.429.3034
Article Source: http://EzineArticles.com/?expert=Rocco_Beatrice

In one of two ways:

1. He fails to recognize the signs and symptoms of an impending heart attack, or an ongoing heart attack, or

2. He fails to properly interpret the tests that were taken.

Let’s talk about #1 above. Typically, a patient will go to a hospital emergency room with complaints of belly or chest pain. The pain could be radiating from the chest to the shoulder or arm. The patient might be sweaty and clammy. They could be experiencing crushing chest pain. The problem arises when the patient’s complaints are not typical for what is commonly seen in a heart attack victim.

The words “heart attack” are a misnomer. What do I mean? The doctors refer to a heart attack as a “myocardial infarction.” It basically means one of two things: (1) That part of your heart muscle has died, or (2) The blood vessel(s) that supply the heart with blood and oxygen has been cut off, causing part of your heart to starve and possibly die.

When we hear that someone has had heart bypass surgery, it usually means that one or more of the blood vessels that supply the heart with blood and oxygen has been restricted or obstructed, and surgery was done to allow blood to ‘bypass’ or go around the obstruction.

Sometimes when a patient presents to a doctor or an emergency room with an upset stomach or back pain, the doctor may not correctly interpret the symptoms, and may incorrectly diagnose the patient as having a gastric problem (a problem with their digestive system) and not a cardiac problem. The problem arises when the patient returns home and hours or days later, they die as a result of a ‘heart attack’.

Let’s discuss #2 above, where the doctor incorrectly interprets the EKG or a stress test, and thinks it’s normal, when in reality it is not. Again, the patient is discharged home with instructions on diet and exercise and to follow up with their doctor or cardiologist in a few weeks. Needless to say, the patient returns home and days, weeks, or even months later, the patient dies of a heart attack.

What does a New York medical malpractice attorney look for when evaluating a claim of “failure to diagnose a heart attack?” Your attorney needs to know the following:

1. If you had been correctly diagnosed at the time you had symptoms, what treatment would you have had? Would you have had a stent put in your cardiac artery or vein (a stent is a device designed to open up a clogged artery or vein, and is put in using a catheter, instead of having major open-heart surgery)? Would you have received nitroglycerin to help ease the flow of blood and reduce your pain?

2. Would you have had elective open-heart bypass surgery? By elective, I mean that you have had time to discuss the surgery with your doctor and learn about the risks, benefits and alternatives to the surgery. Sometimes when a patient has had a heart attack, tests might reveal that many of the blood vessels supplying the heart are severely clogged. The patient may then need emergency bypass surgery, and you may not have a chance to discuss any alternatives, as there may not be any at that point.

3. If elective bypass surgery were done, and there was no blood vessel that remained clogged, would you have suffered the heart attack that you ultimately did? If the answer is no, then your potential malpractice case just got stronger. In other words, if your injuries were preventable if you had been timely diagnosed, you would not be in the condition you’re in now. That’s very significant and important.

Recently, I had the privilege of representing a young man whose cardiac condition was misdiagnosed. He had gone to a hospital with complaints of chest pain that was incorrectly diagnosed. He was told to follow-up with his cardiologist to address his ongoing complaints of chest pain. Three months later, this young man suffered a devastating heart attack, killing off a large part of his heart muscle. When the records were reviewed by cardiologists (heart doctors) we learned that the doctors initially misread the diagnostic tests that were performed, and missed the key opportunity to perform elective heart bypass surgery. As a result of that failure, months went by where the young man continued to complain of chest pain. The heart attack has destroyed this man’s life. Unfortunately for him, his heart attack was totally preventable.

A heart attack may be preventable. Let your lawyer know what symptoms, if any, you had when you saw your doctor and what was done for you. Tell your attorney the details of what went on in the emergency room and what tests they performed to find out if you had or were having a heart attack. Prevention is always best. Knowing that a heart attack could have been prevented is second best.

Gerry Oginski is an experienced New York medical malpractice and personal injury trial attorney and practices exclusively in the State of New York. He has tirelessly represented injured victims in all types of medical malpractice and injury cases in the last 19 years. As a solo practitioner he is able to devote 100% of his time to each individual client. A client is never a file number in his office.

Take a look at Gerry’s website http://www.oginski-law.com and read his free special reports on malpractice and accident law. Read actual testimony of real doctors in medical malpractice cases. Learn answers to your legal questions. We have over 200 FAQs to the most interesting legal questions. Read about his success stories. Read the latest injury and malpractice news. I guarantee there’s something for you. http://www.oginski-law.com 516-487-8207

Also, take a look at Gerry’s FREE NY Medical Malpractice video tutorials at http://medicalmalpracticetutorial.blogspot.com

Article Source: http://EzineArticles.com/?expert=Gerry_Oginski

What do you think?

The short answer is no. The longer answer is still no and here’s why.

Doctors who perform colonoscopies are aware that perforating the colon (making a hole by mistake) is a known recognized risk of the procedure. Obviously no doctor wants to make a hole in the colon, but once in a while it does happen. The fact that it happens is, in my opinion, and the opinion of every physician I’ve ever talked to about it, is not a departure from good care.

“But I was in the hospital for weeks, and I couldn’t eat solid food, and I needed to change my bowel movements in this disgusting bag…” Yes, that’s all true…but those injuries did not result from a departure from good medical care. The medical community recognizes that there are risks with every procedure. This happens to be one of those risks associated with a colonscopy.

“How come I heard that my neighbor had a case, and his colon was perforated during a colonoscopy, but you’re telling me I don’t have a case?” The reason your neighbor has a case is because during his procedure the doctor created a hole in the colon and failed to recognize it. The following day the patient called the doctor complaining about belly pain and back pain, and was ‘poo-pooed’ away by the doctor claiming it’s normal to have discomfort after the colonoscopy. Two days later, the patient spiked a fever and got very sick. Only after calling the doctor’s office repeatedly to advise him of these worsening problems did he suggest going to the emergency room. In the emergency room your neighbor had an MRI which showed some type of fluid in his belly- where it shouldn’t have been. Your neighbor was rushed into emergency surgery where surgeons found a belly full of fecal material (bowel movements) where it clearly should not have been. After cleaning him out, they found the hole that was made during the colonoscopy. Your neighbor then had to get a colostomy bag and remain in the hospital for 10 days on heavy-duty antibiotics.

Here’s the key to determining whether you have a potential case:

The fact that there was a perforation during your colonoscopy is, in all liklihood, not malpractice. It’s the FAILURE TO RECOGNIZE the hole that is a departure from good care. When the patient called to complain, the first thing the doctor should have done is get the patient back into the office for an evaluation. Additional tests may be ordered which may reveal the ongoing problem. If this fails to detect the problem and the patient continues to complain, the next step is usually to send the patient into the emergency room for a full work-up and evaluation.

Only with proper and timely monitoring of the patient and prompt attention to the patient’s complaints can a potential tragedy be averted. So, do you have a case if there was a perforation to your colon during colonoscopy? Unlikely. If the doctor failed to detect the perforation, and you continued to complain, and your condition worsened, then you need to speak to an experienced medical malpractice attorney who practices in the State of New York immediately.

Gerry Oginski is an experienced medical malpractice and personal injury trial attorney practicing law in Brooklyn, Bronx, Queens, New York, Staten Island, Nassau & Suffolk. He has tirelessly represented injured victims in all types of medical malpractice and injury cases for over 19 years. As a solo practitioner he is able to devote 100% of his time to each individual client. A client is never a file number in his office.

Take a look at Gerry’s website http://www.oginski-law.com and read his free special reports on malpractice and accident law. Read actual testimony of real doctors in medical malpractice cases. Learn answers to your legal questions. We have over 200 FAQs to the most interesting legal questions. Read about his success stories. Read the latest injury and malpractice news. I guarantee there’s something for you. See Gerry’s website at http://www.oginski-law.com . Call him at 516-487-8207.

Also, go over to http://medicalmalpracticetutorial.blogspot.com for Gerry’s free instructional videos on malpractice & accident law.

Article Source: http://EzineArticles.com/?expert=Gerry_Oginski

How could this happen in today’s day and age? Here’s an apparently well-trained physician who claimed, according to his PR person’s statement that “He was unaware that what he was doing was incorrect.” Give me a break. It’s common knowledge that you don’t re-use needles, and you certainly don’t re-use syringes. Why would anyone re-use a syringe? It makes no sense.

Here’s how it happened, according to the New York State Department of Health:
The anesthesiologist used a clean needle and syringe to obtain medicine from a vial. The medicine was injected into patient #1. The anesthesiologist removed the needle and then replaced the needle onto the syringe that he had used for patient #1. He then sticks the new needle and old syringe into the original medicine vial he used for patient #1. He then injects medicine into patient #2.

After an investigation by the department of health, they determined that a trace amount of patient #1’s bodily fluids likely ended up in the syringe after the first injection. When this doctor inserted the new needle and old syringe into the old medicine vial, it likely contaminated it with patient #1 blood. The tainted medicine vial was then used to inject other patients.

Infection control is critical to preventing errors such as this one where two patients suffered hepatitis from this doctor’s improper infection control. The doctor claims that he was cleared by the Department of Health, and given remedial instruction on how to use these ‘multi-use’ vials.

However, when looked at from a legal point of view, and not from a Department of Health regulation point of view, one could certainly argue that there was a departure from good medical care that resulted in significant harm (the hepatitis) to the patient.

I’ll leave it to the politicians to point fingers at the New York State Department of Health and the Nassau County Department of Health about why they didn’t notify this doctors’ patients two years ago about the possibility they may have contracted hepatitis from this improper procedure.

Importantly, if you believe you contracted hepatitis or other infectious disease from improper infection control, you should contact an experienced New York medical malpractice lawyer immediately.

Gerry Oginski is an experienced medical malpractice and personal injury trial attorney practicing law in Brooklyn, Bronx, Queens, New York, Staten Island, Nassau & Suffolk. He has tirelessly represented injured victims in all types of medical malpractice and injury cases for over 19 years. As a solo practitioner he is able to devote 100% of his time to each individual client. A client is never a file number in his office.

Take a look at Gerry’s website http://www.oginski-law.com and read his free special reports on malpractice and accident law. Read actual testimony of real doctors in medical malpractice cases. Learn answers to your legal questions. We have over 200 FAQs to the most interesting legal questions. Read about his success stories. Read the latest injury and malpractice news. I guarantee there’s something for you. See Gerry’s website at http://www.oginski-law.com

Call him at 516-487-8207.

Also, go over to http://medicalmalpracticetutorial.blogspot.com for Gerry’s free instructional videos on malpractice & accident law.

Article Source: http://EzineArticles.com/?expert=Gerry_Oginski

The short answer is no. The longer answer is maybe. Here’s what I mean. In any dental malpractice matter, as with any medical malpractice case, a New York attorney must be able to prove not only that there was wrongdoing, but the wrongdoing caused injury, and the injury must be significant and/or permanent. All of those elements must be confirmed by a dental expert who has either examined you, or by an expert who has reviewed all of your records and x-rays. If any one of those elements is missing, then there is no way to bring a successful case on your behalf.

Dentists are often associated with pain. There’s pain to get an injection to anesthetize part of your mouth. There’s pain with a cavity and pain with infection. Pain is what usually leads us to the dentist in the first place. If you’re having root canal treatment, it usually means that you had pain that didn’t go away with filling your cavity. Your nerve needs to come out, and root canal may be the only way to do it. Sometimes the dentist is unable to get the entire nerve root, leaving a small piece in the canal. This may be the reason for your pain. Maybe you have a post-procedure infection causing you pain. Maybe the dentist didn’t numb your entire mouth and you still feel the pain. This pain is either part of the initial problem, or part of the procedure, or a complication of the procedure.

Unless your lawyer can prove that your pain was directly caused by something that was done improperly, it will be difficult, if not impossible to prove your case. If however, your lawyer can show that something was done wrong, like leaving a needle inside the canal and the dentist failed to recognize that, you might then be able to show liability. However, the next step is in proving the extent of your injuries. If you suffered minimal injury, again, it will be difficult to prove a long-lasting and permanent condition. If instead, you suffered permanent problems requiring ongoing and continued dental care and reconstruction, you might just have a basis for proceeding forward.

To find out more, contact an experienced New York malpractice attorney who handles dental and medical malpractice cases- immediately.

Gerry Oginski is an experienced medical malpractice and personal injury trial attorney practicing law in Brooklyn, Bronx, Queens, New York, Staten Island, Nassau & Suffolk. He has tirelessly represented injured victims in all types of medical malpractice and injury cases for over 19 years. As a solo practitioner he is able to devote 100% of his time to each individual client. A client is never a file number in his office.

Take a look at Gerry’s website http://www.oginski-law.com and read his free special reports on malpractice and accident law. Read actual testimony of real doctors in medical malpractice cases. Learn answers to your legal questions. We have over 200 FAQs to the most interesting legal questions. Read about his success stories. Read the latest injury and malpractice news. I guarantee there’s something for you. See Gerry’s website at http://www.oginski-law.com Call him at 516-487-8207.

Also, go over to http://medicalmalpracticetutorial.blogspot.com for Gerry’s free instructional videos on malpractice & accident law.

Article Source: http://EzineArticles.com/?expert=Gerry_Oginski

“I don’t like the way my surgery came out,”

“The doctor stitched me up too tightly,”

“I was in the hospital too long,”

“My wound got infected,”

“I wanted to be a B cup, but now I’m a C cup,”

“My breasts are still uneven,”

“My scars are prominent, and I can’t wear a bikini,”

“The doctor didn’t center my nipple when he did my breast surgery.”

The real question that a New York medical malpractice lawyer needs to evaluate is whether these problems stem from improper medical care. In elective plastic surgery cases many women do not realize that just because they did not get an optimal or ideal result does not necessarily mean that there was malpractice.

Another important issue is that there is something called ‘medical judgment’ when doing elective plastic surgery. One doctor may use one type of suture material, and another doctor may use a different material. As long as each method is medically acceptable, the fact that one chose to use a certain type of suture material over another is a judgment call, and that choice is generally not considered malpractice.

Let’s look at wound infections. Wound infections can unfortunately happen even in the best of care, and the fact that a woman develops a post-operative wound infection, again, does not instantly mean there was wrongdoing.

Most patients who have breast reduction or augmentation surgery want to improve their looks. They believe plastic surgery is the way to accomplish this. The reality is that no plastic surgeon will ever guarantee a result. “I’ve done thousands of breast surgeries…don’t worry about a thing,” the famous Park Avenue plastic surgeon said to a patient during her consultation. What he didn’t tell her was that there are risks to every surgical procedure. Had she known about those risks, she never would have had the surgery.

There are many women who have revision surgery to minimize their scars. Others have their implants replaced for different sizes. The tummy tuck that was sutured too tightly may need to be surgically opened and loosened. Those patients who have revisions are sometimes given ‘freebies’ by the surgeon. In other words, he (or she) will not charge for a repeat or corrective surgery. I receive some calls from women who are furious that they need revision surgery and their surgeon still wants to charge them $10,000, $15,000 or even $20,000 cash. (Remember, insurance doesn’t usually pay for elective plastic surgery.)

I am often asked to look at the horrible result a plastic surgeon caused. Some photos show terrible looking scars. The nipple may be off-center. The scarring may be keloid and raised. It may be a fresh scar and not have had time to heal yet.

Here’s why a plastic surgery victim calls a lawyer’s office to ask if they have a valid medical malpractice case:

They see themselves as disfigured following a costly and time-consuming surgical procedure. They went into this expecting to be made more beautiful than they were. When they come out worse than they expected they get upset. When the patient confronts her fears and concerns with the doctor, the doctors’ response will usually determine whether I get called. Typically, these women are at first ashamed that a respected doctor could give them such a terrible result. The feelings of shame turn to anger after talking to friends and family about her predicament. The inability to wear sexy revealing clothes certainly creates frustration. A caring physician may appear cold-hearted when he (or she) fails to take the patient’s concerns seriously. Here’s the kicker that always generates a call to the lawyer’s office…

The doctor refuses to do a revision surgery unless the patient pays full price, in cash, before the surgery.

In order to properly evaluate a potential case I need to obtain and review all of your medical records. I need to have an expert plastic surgeon review and comment on your treatment. Only if my expert confirms that (1) there were departures from good care that (2) caused you injury and (3) that the injury is significant and permanent, are we permitted to go forward and prosecute a case on your behalf.

If any one of those three elements noted above are missing, then it becomes impossible to prove a successful case. The first step to evaluating your possible case is to speak to an experienced New York medical malpractice attorney as soon as possible. By obtaining as much information as you can, you become a better informed consumer and learn the process of how a lawyer chooses to accept a case.

Gerry Oginski is an experienced medical malpractice and personal injury trial attorney practicing law in Brooklyn, Bronx, Queens, New York, Staten Island, Nassau & Suffolk. He has tirelessly represented injured victims in all types of medical malpractice and injury cases for over 19 years. As a solo practitioner he is able to devote 100% of his time to each individual client. A client is never a file number in his office.

Take a look at Gerry’s website http://www.oginski-law.com and read his free special reports on malpractice and accident law. Read actual testimony of real doctors in medical malpractice cases. Learn answers to your legal questions. We have over 200 FAQs to the most interesting legal questions. Read about his success stories. Read the latest injury and malpractice news. I guarantee there’s something for you. See Gerry’s website at http://www.oginski-law.com . Call him at 516-487-8207.

Also, go over to http://medicalmalpracticetutorial.blogspot.com for Gerry’s free instructional videos on malpractice & accident law.

Article Source: http://EzineArticles.com/?expert=Gerry_Oginski

By Patricia Woloch

Victims of psychiatric malpractice face a difficult battle. Mental health care patients are vulnerable to negligence and wrongdoing by the very nature of their condition. When the do speak up about mistreatment, their complaints are often dismissed or ignored.

Patients with a history of emotional instability, impaired judgment, or erratic behavior are easily taken advantage of by the mental health system. Due to the stigma of mental illness, those capable of speaking up for themselves often lack the courage, feeling that no one will believe their claims.

Psychiatric malpractice is a very real form of medical malpractice, which can have devastating mental, emotional, and physical consequences. Psychiatric malpractice can be deadly. It should never be ignored.

Informed Consent

Mental health care patients have the legal right to be informed of the risks and benefits of undergoing or choosing not to undergo a treatment. Just like any other type of patient, they have the right to refuse!

Unfortunately, many patients, their loved ones, and the general public are under the impression that the right of informed consent does not apply to mental health patients.

What constitutes psychiatric malpractice?

Mental health care providers have a duty to treat their patients with dignity, provide adequate care, and prevent harm. Unsuccessful does not in and of itself constitute malpractice. Psychiatric malpractice includes:

· Failure to diagnose

· Failure to treat

· Failure to recognize worsening of condition

· Negligent psychotherapy

· Abandonment

· Negligent or harmful use of medications

· Failure to monitor medications

· Lack of informed consent for medications, therapeutic technique, or procedure

· Emotional manipulation

· Fraud

· Breach of confidentiality

· Defamation

· False imprisonment (including inappropriate restraint)

· Physical abuse

· Sexual Misconduct

· Failure to prevent harm to self or others

· Inadequate supervision

· Wrongful death

Medication errors

Mental health care providers have a duty to prescribe appropriate medications, in appropriate doses. The medications prescribed for psychological disorders can be dangerous, causing severe physical and emotional side effects. Many of these drugs are even more dangerous if a patient suddenly stops taking them. Doctors have a duty to inform patients of the side effects of the drugs that they are prescribed and the dangers of ceasing medication.

In some cases doctors have been misinformed by drug companies, about the medications they are prescribing. Even worse, they may not have been told about dangerous side effects that were known to the drug makers, such as suicidal behavior. Drug manufacturers will often try to claim that the deadly results were caused by the mental illness rather than the medication.

When patients are harmed by defective medications the responsibility normally falls on the drug makers, rather than the doctor who prescribed the drug. Then it becomes a product liability suit instead of a medical malpractice suit.

Taking action

You do not need to know which kind of lawsuit you have in order to take action. If you feel that you or a loved one has been the victim of psychiatric malpractice, you should talk to an attorney who has experience with these kinds of cases. Your attorney will investigate, determine what type of case you have, and advise you on the best course of action.

Contact a qualified attorney in your area by visiting The Personal Injury Lawyers Directory Article Source: http://EzineArticles.com/?expert=Patricia_Woloch

Wrongful death is a claim against a person who can be held liable for the death, even though there was no direct intention to kill. For the claim to stand, the person must be deemed negligent or strictly liable for the demise of the deceased. Additionally, for the suit to legally hold up in court, the victim must have had a dependant party, such as a family member, who suffered emotional and financial damages as a result of the wrongful death. The standard of proof in this type of case is a preponderance of evidence, instead of clear and convincing evidence or beyond a reasonable doubt.

This sort of lawsuit differs from a normal negligence suit, which is actually filed by the person who was injured or suffered damages. Under original common law, a wrongful death claim was believed impossible to file because the claim died with the victim, thereby eliminating any potential course of reimbursement for damages. However, over the years, states have drafted their own wrongful death statutes. Although each state’s law varies slightly, they generally consist of four common elements. First, the death was caused, in whole or in part, by the defendant. Next, the defendant was negligent or liable for the victim’s passing. A surviving spouse, child, or relative of the deceased must be present and monetary damages must have resulted from the victim’s death.

Financial damages recoverable in this type of lawsuit include medical, hospital, funeral, and burial expenses, compensation for pain and suffering, and losses to the kin, including loss of financial support from the deceased, loss of parental guiding and training, loss of companionship, and loss of service. An unfortunate side effect of wrongful death cases is that living family members must often jockey for control of the estate of the victim, oftentimes affecting the distribution of financial compensation.

The death of a loved one is never a joyous event, even more so when the death was sudden and due to the negligence of a third party. If you are interested in learning more, this wrongful death website can help.

Joseph Devine

Article Source: http://EzineArticles.com/?expert=Joseph_Devine

- Defective products and the health concerns that they cause are not your fault. You relied on Medtronic to produce safe products and they failed to do so. It is the company’s responsibility to properly test and manufacture safe products and anyone who has been wrongfully harmed as a result of a defect should be compensated for their suffering.

- Medtronic failed to warn consumers about the defective after it was initially discovered. Not only is it the responsibility of a company to produce safe products, but it is also their responsibility to initiate a recall if defects have been found in the products that they manufacture.

- The medical care needed to remove or replace a defective defibrillator can be incredibly costly. While you may feel hesitant to file a lawsuit, remember that you should not be forced to pay for medical treatments or procedures that are needed to correct a product defect. Manufacturers are responsible for properly testing and producing safe products for consumer use.

- The defective defibrillator puts you at danger for serious health complications. The time it may take to recover from the ordeal could cause you to miss time at work or even lose your job completely. Consider the wide range of negative effects the defect can have on your life. Remember, the manufacturer is liable for the quality of their products. If the defect of your defibrillator has caused you to suffer, it may be in your best interest to file a lawsuit.

What do I need to do in order to file a Medtronic lawsuit?

- Medical records

- Possible grounds for filing suit

- Possible defendants in your case

- The possibility of joining forces with other claimants in a joint suit

- The amount of expenses that you might reasonably expect as a result of your suffering

Taking the First Steps

If you have suffered due to a defective defibrillator and have decided to file a lawsuit, the first step in the process is choosing a law firm or attorney who has a great deal of experience handling this type of case. Taking large manufacturers in court can be difficult, so having a lawyer with the knowledge and experience to aggressively protect your rights is invaluable.

Contact a Medtronic lawyer today to learn more about your legal rights.

Joseph Devine

Article Source: http://EzineArticles.com/?expert=Joseph_Devine

However Martin Bare of the Association of Personal Injury Lawyers (APIL) states that the number of claims in the UK is actually falling and that personal injury claims are important of civilized society. It is important to make sure that individuals live in a safe environment and any harm caused by negligence on the part of another should be brought to justice.

Personal injury claims can cover a wide variety of situations, from hospital malpractice to falling over a cracked paving stone on the street. Being involved in a car accident, suffering from work related stress and having a slip, trip or falls can all form the basis of a compensation claim. The main crux has to be that someone, somewhere has been negligence and this has lead to personal injury. But the British law is complex and it would be very difficult to pursue a claim without the help of a qualified lawyer.

However a lawyer must be paid for and there is no legal aid available for personal injury claims. This goes someway to explaining the plethora of ‘No win, no fee’ advertisements, but be warned these deals may not be as good as they sound. While it seems that a ‘No win, no fee’ offer will keep you financially safe if you lose, you will be liable for the fees of the defendants solicitors, which will typically start at £5,000. This is a significant cost to bear on top of the emotional heart ache of losing a case where you believe the other side were at fault.

In addition the sums of money award for these types of compensation claims are often not as high as people imagine. Melanie MacDonald author of the Which? Essential Guide to Making a Claim says that often claimants are disappointed at the amount of money they are awarded, and had previously been overestimating the amount they would receive. As a rough guide, a typical ‘general damages’ claim for recoverable injuries will net around £10,000. If you are making a claim for ’special damages’ you can expect more, but this would be to cover things such as loss of salary or future care.

A compensation claim can take months to reach conclusion and often will be settled out of court. However if you have been involved in a serious accident, it may be worth the wait. With the British welfare system inadequately funded, if you or a loved one do need treatment or longer term care the money you will receive will go some way to supporting you through this difficult time. If or the other hand your injuries are minor and superficial, you may find the whole process more stress than it’s worth and it could end up costing you money!

Danielle is an author of several articles pertaining to No Win No Fee, Compensation Claims Personal Injury Claims and other legal articles.

Article Source: http://EzineArticles.com/?expert=Danielle_Fletcher

* Asking for a medical bill each time you see a doctor or facility – EVEN if your insurance is paying for it;
* Save all prescription bills and bottles. Sometimes a pile of pill bottles in front of a jury works better than words in describing your ordeal ;
* Keep a separate chart/list with dates, amounts of medical bills, and purchases of medication or equipment. This amount may be greater than just medical bills because you could be buying such things as heating pads, sleeping aids, supportive devices, etc. Your lawyer may use this list to show the other side or the jury how much trouble you have in dealing with your injuries.

Even though your attorney will obtain copies of your medical bills and records directly from the medical facilities, your documents will provide a crucial double-check process that assures your claim is settled for maximum value. Your attorney cannot demand compensation for bills he does not know about. Attorneys will tell you that all to frequently a facility will only send them a portion of your bills because they may have switched outsourcing billing agencies for example.

Another critical task that you, as the client are responsible for is organizing and documenting how your life was affected by the accident. You want to do the following:

* Keep any written statements you made or someone else gave, whether to the police, a doctor, or an insurance investigator. If you do not have copies of these statements, at least make a note of you remembering or seeing a statement given.
* Keep all letters to/from insurance adjusters, including emails, and any business cards that anyone has handed you.
* Keep a journal/diary of how your life has been affected by the accident. List the things you cannot do now and things you can still do but with pain. Describe how your day is with pain or embarrassing incidents that happen because of your injuries. Keep each entry short and to the point. This helps your attorney to craft a compelling argument for your pain and suffering damages. If you do not write this stuff down as it happens, you will forget all the little things and will not be able to tell your attorney how your life was really affected.
* Keep all proof of your car’s property damage. This includes photographs, repair estimates, or repair bills. The damage to your car is usually very compelling evidence of how severe the accident was.
* Locate or obtain a copy of your insurance policy. Your attorney will want to review your policies policy to determine if you have additional insurance coverage available.

ABOUT THE AUTHOR: David Brauns is an experienced personal injury trial attorney practicing in Atlanta, Georgia. He began his career working for insurance companies with the intention of learning how they defended serious personal injury cases so that he could one day start his own law firm and oppose them. Unlike other personal injury lawyers, David only takes a select number of cases each year to ensure that he is strategically litigating each of his clients’ cases towards maximum value.

Visit http://www.braunslaw.com to learn more about your case and how to hire the right lawyer. David created a website focused on you, the potential client with lots of questions about your case, and not some brochure website that just talks about his firm. Read http://www.braunslaw.com now, before you retain a lawyer.

David promises you will learn something that improves either your case or your relationship with your attorney. Or, you can call David at (770) 783-1388.

Article Source: http://EzineArticles.com/?expert=David_Brauns

Today, the circumstances are a little different. With the evolution of technology and scientific discovery, our knowledge of the human body and its processes are becoming increasingly accurate. We can determine what action to take in different situations in order to ensure the most profitable outcome. Despite these improvements, birth injuries still occur. These can be caused by a number of different things, ranging from inadequate medical care to natural pregnancy complications.

Some of the most common are as follows:

Abnormal position refers to the way the baby is positioned in the mother’s womb. While doctors can try to reposition the baby, the process can incur even more complications, like tangling the umbilical cord, which can eventually strangle the baby.

Large babies, those that way 8.5 pounds or more, can cause injury to the mother during birth. In some cases, the baby is too large for the birth canal, and in others, the baby can rip or tear flesh, forcing an operation to be done in order to retrieve the baby. This can also occur when the baby is too mature and has been in the womb for a several days beyond the expected delivery date.

Abnormal birthing presentation, the case in which the baby comes out the wrong way (buttocks or feet first), is also another cause of birth injury. In most instances, the doctor can detect or predict the likely outcome of this occurrence in order to prevent injury, but it’s not always the case.

These examples are only three of the possible causes of birth injury. More often than not, though, the fault isn’t on the mother’s genetic makeup, like her size or the nature of her labor. It is sometimes a result of malpractice, a doctor who is does not handle with care or who ignores vital signs that could prevent such injuries from occurring.

When this happens, it’s important to know that there are people who can help. If you or someone you know has been the victim of birth injury due to medical malpractice, consult this website for more information on how you can protect yourself: http://www.birth-injurylawyers.com/

Joseph Devine

Article Source: http://EzineArticles.com/?expert=Joseph_Devine

The Nursing Home Reform Act of 1987 was created in response to an alarming number of neglect and abuse charges that surfaced during the 1980’s. Congress passed the Act in conjunction with the Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act (OBRA). This law protects residents’ rights to be fully informed of services and their charges and participate in their own care, both in receiving adequate and appropriate care and the ability to refuse that care if so desired. Residents also have the rights to privacy and confidentiality, to make independent choices, to have security in their own possessions, to complain, the ability to have visits, and a basic entitlement to dignity, respect, and freedom.

Abuse in nursing homes is usually easier to spot than neglect, simply because abuse normally has physical manifestations. Broken bones, cuts, scars, abrasions, and bed sores are all clues of abuse. Neglect is more subtle and difficult to spot. Potential examples of neglect include insufficient food, water, and bathing opportunities, failure to properly assist an elderly person who needs assistance eating, drinking, or bathing, and failure to supply adequate supplies such as soap or shampoo. If you suspect your loved one has been abused or neglected, it is recommended to speak with them to find out as much information as possible. Overall mood and cleanliness, as well as the general condition of the room and nursing home, should also be observed. Complaints should be filed at the state level as well as contacting the police department where the abuse occurred.

Neglect and abuse in nursing homes is a serious offense. The elderly depend on quality, assisted living when they cannot adequately care for themselves. If you are interested in learning more, this nursing home abuse website can provide more information.

Joseph Devine

Article Source: http://EzineArticles.com/?expert=Joseph_Devine

Case Study

Leon Baker suffered a heart attack after his doctors administered the wrong drug during surgery. He filed a claim alleging medical negligence, which resulted in the award of £200,000 in cash. However, not all claims result in such hefty compensation amounts. In fact, the win rate for medical malpractice claims is much lower than that for road or workplace accidents. This is because in a majority of cases patients do not understand the complex procedures that are involved in filing such a claim.

Criticism

The Personal Injury Valuation Handbook estimates that one in five of medical negligence claims involve death. However, statistics do not reveal the real cost for the patient as well as his or her family. Medical negligence not only causes irreparable physical damage to the patient but also leaves permanent mental scars. Moreover, the process of filing a claim is time-consuming and complex. Yet, some argue against the same laws that protect against faulty treatment. Here are some of the arguments:

• “Medical malpractice laws increase litigation and encourage fraudulent claims.” Not true. Research shows that the risk of fraud is minimal though not zero. The real problem, according to Tom Barker, author of The Medical Malpractice Myth, is too much medical malpractice. In fact, research has shown that a majority of such cases go unreported. Laws are necessary to safeguard the interests of the patient and make medical professionals responsible for their actions.

• “Some medical operations come with known risks for which doctors cannot be held guilty.” AND “It is not always possible to determine if the patient has adequately followed the doctor’s instructions.”

These arguments arise from a misunderstanding of the law. Medical malpractice works on the principle of causation, which means that it is not enough to say that the treatment was substandard or that it did not work. Patients also have to prove a cause-effect relationship between the medical professional’s poor performance and an undesirable result. This involves the role of an “expert witness” who provides expert medical testimony. The final judgement depends on whether the doctor did something inappropriate that most people in the medical profession would not have done.

Should I File a Claim?

Often, patients are unsure about filing a claim for compensation, as it is difficult to determine if something has gone wrong BECAUSE of poor treatment. If you feel that faulty treatment or misdiagnosis is to blame for your poor health, speak to another medical professional immediately.

If there is some evidence of medical malpractice, then contact a solicitor immediately, as all claims usually have a time limit ranging from one to four years. A qualified solicitor with relevant experience is the best person to guide you through the process of filing a claim.

Diana Joseph has an in-depth knowledge in dealing with injury claims. She has written numerous articles on injury claims issues, particularly those involving car accident and other topics of claims. Please contact her for further information on claims related issues.

Article Source: http://EzineArticles.com/?expert=Diana_Joseph

Doctors are human and can make mistakes. They are not infallible. If this should happen it may be necessary to consult a medical malpractice attorney. A medical malpractice attorney specializes in one area only. He or she knows the ins and outs of medical malpractice and can get you the best settlement offer.

If the unthinkable happens and you need a medical malpractice attorney, there are certain guidelines that you should follow when you start your search for an attorney:

• First and foremost, it is important to ask how many years of experience the attorney has. You will want someone who has the experience in both the courtroom and with settlements.

• It is important to determine if the attorney is part of a larger law firm. Larger firms have more resources available to them than single attorneys, and in some instances, it having these extra resources can be a huge benefit to you.

• It is important to ask the attorney if he or she will process your paperwork or if it will be passed on to someone else, such as a paralegal. Some people do not feel comfortable with having many sets of eyes on their personal information.

• Where the attorney is located is a major factor in your decision. If he or she is far away, then attending meeting could be difficult for you. If you are unable to get to meetings, ask the attorney if he or she will come to you. A good medical malpractice attorney will visit you at your home or in the hospital.

• Most medical malpractice attorneys will not charge you for the initial visit or for anything else until you have won your case. This is called contingency. It simply means that your attorney will not be paid unless you win a settlement. However it is important to note that most medical malpractice attorneys receive one-third of the total settlement amount.

• It is important to make sure that your medical malpractice attorney is present at all meetings concerning your case. In some instances, if the attorney is part of a large firm, he or she will send an associate to the meeting. It is important that you understand that you have the right to have your attorney attend all meetings with you. The same holds true if you have to make a court appearance.

• Another factor that is very important when determining the right medical malpractice attorney is the amount of money he or she can get for a settlement. Beware of an attorney that promises huge amounts of money without hearing the particulars of your case.

• Ask for references from past clients. A good attorney will have many success stories and should be willing to share them with you.

• Ask the attorney to explain what your rights are and what you are entitled to. This is very important to know in case the opposing counsel tries to contact you.

• Whichever attorney you choose, check them out thoroughly. This can be done very easily by calling the bar association of the state in which you live. The bar association has records of every attorney in the state and can advise you what the status is of any attorney and if they have a good success rate or complaints against them.

Choosing a medical malpractice attorney may be a lengthy process. However, choosing the right one is critical to the outcome of your case. Taking the time to research your options may result in a bigger settlement for you.

Peter Geisheker is the CEO of The Geisheker Group marketing company.

Peter provides marketing services for law firms, including Louisiana attorneys.

Article Source: http://EzineArticles.com/?expert=Peter_Geisheker

Sometimes medical professionals do not provide the appropriate treatment or they do not provide the sympathy that their patients deserve. Medical malpractice law states that all patients should be treated with respect and the appropriate treatment should be given as and when is needed. When things do not go as planned, that is when medical malpractice lawsuits are filed.

Understanding Medical Malpractice Lawsuits

If you have been unfairly treated or if your doctor has overlooked a simple problem, you can file medical malpractice lawsuits against them. Doctors train for years to be able to help people and members of the public rely upon them to do their job properly. A misdiagnoses can really affect a person’s life and in some cases it can even be fatal. That is why medical malpractice law exists. It is there to protect members of the public and to ensure that they receive the right treatment as and when it is needed. I

f you have suffered from a misdiagnoses then you will need to find a medical malpractice lawyer. There are many lawyers who specialize in medical malpractice law and finding one should not be a problem. However, finding a good one may take some time.

Ideally when you look for medical malpractice attorneys, you will need to look into their qualifications. You want somebody who is passionate about what they do and who will help you to get the compensation that you deserve. In some cases no amount of money can help you to get over the poor judgment made by medical professionals; however by filing medical malpractice lawsuits, you can help to ensure that a wrong diagnosis is not given to other people in the future.

Try and make an appointment with a medical malpractice attorney wherever possible. This initial appointment gives you a chance to ask various questions in order to see if they are the best person to help you. Test their knowledge on medical malpractice law. Perhaps do a little research yourself beforehand so that you know whether they are telling you the truth. Of course you should book an appointment with more than one medical malpractice attorney if you are to get the best advice.

Overall the right medical malpractice lawyer will be able to help you to get justice for any wrongdoing you have been subjected to by a medical practitioner. Medical malpractice law is set up to protect you and there are hundreds of medical malpractice lawyers who are wiling to get you the help and the compensation that you deserve.

To learn more about Medical malpractice lawsuits, check out the Free Consumer Review Web Site.

Article Source: http://EzineArticles.com/?expert=Garry_L._Neale

If you asked someone what the value of a wife’s household duties were, what would they say?

If you asked someone what the value was of a mother who stayed home to take care of her two small children, what would they say?

What if you asked someone what the value was of a father, in the prime of his life, to his three children in grade school, what would they say?

If someone was earning $75,000 per year and was unable to work for two months, you could easily calculate how much income they lost. But are you able to calculate the lost benefits that man would have received had he continued to work? If he was at work during those two months he would have given that big presentation he was working on for the past year. He’d have done so well that he would have gotten that promotion he was working so hard to get. With that promotion came a larger salary, increased pension benefits, his own parking space, and more importantly, the opportunity to hob-nob with the big-wigs in his company. But since this man was out on disability because he was hit by a car, he was unable to achieve these goals he had set for himself.

What is the value of what this man has lost? The lost opportunity to move up the ladder, the lost opportunity for promotion, the lost chance for more benefits and increased recognition within the company? Can you place a dollar value on these losses?

Let me ask you this- if you own a Picasso painting that is valued at $5 million dollars, and that painting is destroyed in a fire, is there any doubt how much your insurance company should reimburse you for your destroyed property? They must reimburse you $5 million dollars.

Now, using that same argument, if a man earns $75,000 per year and is hit by a car, and he is unable to return to work for two months, the insurance company should have no problem reimbursing him for his lost earnings- 2 months worth. But wait! What if this man, who suffered a broken left leg and right arm is no longer able to do the same type of work he did before his accident? What if his ability to work is now limited? Do you think the insurance company is responsible to pay for this man’s lost future earnings compared to what he is earning now? If they’re responsible for his lost earnings in the past, shouldn’t they also be responsible for his inability to work in the future? What about his limited ability to work? Should they also be responsible for the limited work he can now perform and make up the difference from what he was earning before? The answer is yes.

What if this man was a professional basketball player who earned $5 million dollars a year- not an unreasonable sum of money today for a pro basketball player. Is the driver of the car that hit him responsible if this man can no longer play basketball and his career is over? That 5 year contract, worth a total of $30 million dollars is worthless if this man can’t play ball. Who do you think should be responsible for that life-altering accident?

What I’ve been discussing here are key elements of compensation that an injured victim is entitled to receive in the State of New York. Importantly, we haven’t even touched on a victims’ pain and the suffering that an accident can have- not only on the injured victim, but on his spouse and family as well.

It is important to remember that compensation is a duty to repay a debt that is owed.

When a person causes an accident or an injury, regardless of whether it was a careless driver, a homeowner who didn’t shovel their sidewalk, or a doctor who failed to diagnose cancer, they have now created harm where there was none before. They now owe a debt to the injured victim. Compensation in New York is repayment of that debt. Often that repayment is expensive. The injured victim often requires corrective medical care, the possibility of surgery and extensive physical therapy for rehabilitation. Shouldn’t the injured victim be able to pay for the best medical care money can buy? Or do you think it’s OK for an injured victim to go to any old city clinic and get whoever is on duty that day to correct a problem that someone else caused?

The compensation I’ve been talking about here is what is known as “economic damages.” These can be calculated. The cost of a housekeeper to do a wife’s household duties can be calculated by an economist. The value of a stay-at-home mom can, on some level, be calculated. Lost income and lost future earnings can be calculated. The cost for future medical expenses can be calculated. I don’t think many people would argue that these expenses should not be repaid to the injured victim, especially since this is part of a debt that is owed and must be repaid.

What about the “non-economic damages,” also known as “pain and suffering.” Shouldn’t this be compensable too? Remember, we haven’t even touched on this subject yet. I’ve only been discussing the actual economic loss that someone has suffered from an accident or medical malpractice. However, the suffering that an accident causes is often a very large part of any claim. Why? Just think about how an injury affects an accident victim:

Before the accident, Tim used to play catch with his seven-year-old son in their backyard. Because Tim is now in a wheelchair, he can no longer run and play baseball with his son. He can’t drive- not the way he used to. Getting into and out of a car is a time-consuming chore that was previously effortless. He has a basement and a second floor in his modest home. Tim can’t go into his basement and play ping-pong with his 12 year old daughter. Nor can he walk upstairs to go to bed with his wife anymore. He’s had to convert his living room into a modified hospital room. Those front steps to their home have now been converted to a ramp since he couldn’t get his wheelchair up those steps. The dinner table had to be cut down to allow Tim to sit at the table with his family, because his wheelchair wasn’t high enough to reach the table top. Did I mention that Tim loved to ski and hike in the Vermont mountains? For the rest of Tim’s life, he’ll never be able to ski or hike again. Tim lives in his wheelchair that has become his home for 18 hours each day. Did you know that because Tim can’t feel anything below his waist, he’ll get sores on his butt and infections that he won’t even know about until it is festering? The doctors tell Tim that he’ll need a new wheelchair every five years. “What does a wheelchair cost?” Tim asks.

Tim must face his friends and family every day and explain his new-found limitations in life. Have you considered what will be of Tim’s relationship with his wife? Do you think his wife is going to be able to take care of Tim’s daily medical needs at home without help? Can she cook, clean, take care of the house and kids and take care of her husband’s daily cleaning rituals? How do you take a shower if you can’t walk? How do you dress yourself if you can’t get to the closet and reach those high shelves with your clothes? What if, God forbid, there is a fire in his home? How does he get out quickly if nobody else is home?

With every accident or malpractice injury there is usually a physical injury that can be devastating. Have you also considered the psychological impact of an injury? Our minds are vigorous and active. An injured victim is often trapped within their body. The emotional toll an injury causes and the psychological after-effects are equally devastating. Yet with all that we know about repaying a debt that is owed, how is a wrongdoer or their insurance company going to repay a debt that cannot easily be quantified?

Well, let’s go back to the $5 million dollar Picasso painting. If the value of that painting can be calculated and replaced then why can’t the value of human suffering and the indignity it causes? All arise from the same accident or medical wrongdoing. Isn’t there some way we can repay that debt too? There is. Unfortunately, since there are no exact numbers for our pain and suffering and every person who is injured is different and experiences a different level of injury, no two cases are exactly alike. Yet pain and suffering is a very real part of a victims’ life. There is a way to compensate such a injured man…use the economic damages as a starting point and go from there. The only downside to this is if the injured victim is not working or is very young or very old. In those cases you will not have all of those economic damages to look to when starting your journey in awarding compensation for human suffering. For those cases you must use your common sense and understanding of the human condition in order to reach a full and fair number to compensate a victim for their pain and the suffering they’ve endured and will endure for the remainder of their life.

Here’s an example of a story used in closing argument to explain one way to evaluate pain and suffering:

“$10 MILLION DOLLARS FREE!” THE CLASSIFIED AD SAID

If you thought the ad was true, wouldn’t you race out the door to be the first one in line asking for the promised money? What if the ad said that before you could get your “Free $10 Million Dollars” you first had be involved in a head-on car crash? How many people do you think would still wait in line for that free money? I’ll bet you there would be some desperate people waiting for that money, regardless of what it took to get it.

What if there were more conditions that you had to meet before you could get that money?

Let’s say in addition to getting hit by a car head-on, you had to have been ejected from your car, airlifted by helicopter to the nearest trauma center where you fractured your pelvis, both your legs, were on a respirator for 20 days, you needed surgery to put the broken bones back together with hardware, pins and screws, and were hospitalized for 4 weeks. How many people to you think would still be on line asking for that “Free $10 Million Dollars?” Not many. Yet I’m sure you’d still find a few very desperate souls willing to do most anything for that kind of money.

But wait! Suppose there were even more conditions before you could get your hands on that $10 Million Dollars. Suppose that in addition to the horrendous trauma, lengthy surgery, complications from surgery, being in a medically-induced coma and hospitalized for an entire month, you needed three weeks of rehabilitation therapy where you learned to walk again. Suppose you also couldn’t return to your job earning $60,000 per year, and you couldn’t play with your children because you could barely walk. Your six-year-old wonders why you can’t play soccer and baseball with him, and your 11 year-old asks why you’re home during the day instead of being at work. You spend your days watching ridiculous daytime soap operas thinking how you’ll support your family since you can’t work. Suppose your doctor tells you that you’ll never be able to play sports again, and you’ll be lucky to walk without a limp. Your job at the loading dock required heavy lifting and there’s no way you can lift more than ten pounds now. You doctor says that if you go back to the type of work you were doing before, there’s a good chance you’ll never walk again.

How many people, given those conditions do you think would stick around asking for that “Free $10 Million Dollars?” I don’t think anyone would.

In certain cases, we use this argument in summation to explain to a jury how significant a victims’ injuries are and how the money that we’re asking for is justified. If a lawyer simply asks a jury to award $10 Million Dollars without providing a background or evidence to support the award, a jury is unlikely to give away such a large sum of money. However, when presented with a reasonable explanation such as the one above, it becomes much easier to understand how such an award can be appropriate.

Importantly, a good attorney will usually understate the value of their case, and once the extent of the injuries become apparent, the jury will (hopefully) recognize that the amount asked for is not sufficient to cover all of the medical expenses, lost wages and pain and suffering that the injured victim has suffered.

You think you want $10 million dollars? Sure, who doesn’t. But if an injured victim asks for that compensation look to see what injuries they’ve suffered. Only by looking carefully do we see that this certainly isn’t a ‘windfall’ or a ‘winning lottery ticket’. Instead it is full and fair compensation.

Gerry Oginski is an experienced medical malpractice and personal injury trial attorney practicing law in Brooklyn, Bronx, Queens, New York, Staten Island, Nassau & Suffolk. He has tirelessly represented injured victims in all types of medical malpractice and injury cases for over 19 years. As a solo practitioner he is able to devote 100% of his time to each individual client. A client is never a file number in his office.

Take a look at Gerry’s website http://www.oginski-law.com and read his free special reports on malpractice and accident law. Read actual testimony of real doctors in medical malpractice cases. Learn answers to your legal questions. We have over 200 FAQs to the most interesting legal questions. Read about his success stories. Read the latest injury and malpractice news. I guarantee there’s something for you. See Gerry’s website at http://www.oginski-law.com Call him at 516-487-8207.

Also, go over to http://medicalmalpracticetutorial.blogspot.com for Gerry’s free instructional videos on malpractice & accident law.

Article Source: http://EzineArticles.com/?expert=Gerry_Oginski

You have to remember that in the legal concept, medical malpractice is not limited to the conduct of doctors but also applies to nurses, anesthesiologists, health care facilities, pharmaceutical companies, and other groups that provide health care services.

Before filing a medical malpractice claim, first you must be able to recognize the five warning signs of medical malpractice. How would you know if you are a victim of a medical malpractice? Here are the signs:

• When symptoms are recurring and you do not feel any better despite treatment, it is time for you to get a second or a third medical opinion

• When the symptoms do not match the diagnoses

• When diagnoses are purely based on laboratory tests

• A doctor attributes a common illness to an uncommon ailment. Sometimes a doctor may say that your headache is not an ordinary headache but a brain tumor.

• A diagnoses lack one or two other test parts.

If you experienced one of these signs, you are surely a victim of medical malpractice. When this happens, the best thing to do is hire the services of a lawyer who can help you file a medical malpractice claim.

To establish medical negligence, you must be able to prove the following:

• The existence of a duty by the health professional to the patient – There must be an existing relationship of provider-client in which a health professional is obliged to serve a client

• A breach in the applicable standard of care or a deviation from the standards – When a certain lowering of standard in service occur, it may be considered a breach of standards

• A causal relationship between the standard of care and the patient’s injuries – The deviation in the service standards must have an effect on the patient’s condition

• The injury of the patient – the nature, extent and condition of the injury

Factors Involved in Filing a Case

The decision to pursue a medical malpractice claim is the starting step in the recovery process. Medical malpractice laws are complicated and differ with each state. You have to find the proper lawyer who is acquainted with the laws pertinent to your case.

Another factor is cost involved in the case. In filing a medical malpractice claim, you have to be ready to shoulder the expenses of getting the services of expert witnesses. Expert witnesses and consultants are professional people who will dispute your doctor’s statements.

After determining that you have a substantial claim, now you have to choose a lawyer who can best represent you in the case. In considering a lawyer, you have to look into the lawyer’s experience, the number of cases he handled, etc. In getting the services of a medical malpractice lawyer, it is necessary that you check his backgrounds. Also, try to find out if he can work in your case on a contingency basis.

Before becoming an online writer, Manuel worked as a journalist, a newspaper columnist, a scriptwriter, a fiction writer, a magazine editor, and a tutor. He acquired his legal background as a Senate legislative officer and later on, as a researcher and paralegal staff in various law offices. Someday he hoped to go back and devote more time to writing fiction, which is his first passion.

Article Source: http://EzineArticles.com/?expert=Manuel_Salvacion

Most people believe that if the receive medical treatment and have a bad result, medical malpractice has occurred. This is, in fact, not the case. A bad result might mean malpractice occurred, but then again it might not. Doctors are not held to a standard wherein they have to provide a perfect result every time. Medicine and the human body just do not work that way.

So, what is the secret to understanding your medical malpractice case? It has to do with elements. To prevail in a lawsuit, you must prove certain elements in a case. Generally speaking, these elements are the standard of care, a breach of that standard, causation and damages. Keep in mind that every state has a slightly different version of this law, but this is the general standard for purposes of this article.

The standard of care is often a confusing issue of many. It simply means the minimum standard of care that is required of medical professionals in the community for the particular treatment in question. The standard is established through expert testimony in most cases.

The breach of the standard of care is pretty much what it sounds like. Having established the standard of care, did the defendant fail to meet it? This is again established through expert testimony.

Causation is vital element of the claim as well. If a doctor performs below the standard of care, it doesn’t matter unless it “causes” some damage. If the doctor performed a knee surgery below the standard of care, it doesn’t matter if you are claiming an elbow injury!

Damages are, of course, the final element that must be proved. This is usually done by showing bills related to further medical care. A more subjective claim for “pain and suffering” is usually made as well. Essentially, this is the point where monetary damages are suggested by the plaintiff and argued against by the defense.

If you have received medical treatment you have questions about, you should speak with a medical malpractice attorney in your area. They can give you the low down on the treatment you’ve received and the local standards that apply.

Aazdak Alisimo writes medical malpractice articles for MedicalMalpracticeAttorneyNet.com where you can find a medical malpractice attorney in your area.

Article Source: http://EzineArticles.com/?expert=Aazdak_Alisimo

(Statistics from www.nhsla.com)

Establishing a legal case for anything, especially Clinical Negligence, can at times seem confusing. By breaking it down, it can seem less daunting. In order to understand the legal elements that are required for a successful Clinical Negligence claim, we can break the requirements down into four steps.

The Legal Elements Required:

1. There was a duty of care owed to you
2. There was a breach of that duty (negligence)
3. This breach caused the injury you suffered
4. This resulted in a loss or injury

1. Duty of care

Establishing there is a duty of care is usually straightforward in clinical negligence cases, because where a doctor is treating a patient, a duty will arise.

2. Breech of Duty

In clinical negligence cases, in order to show a medical practitioner has breached his or her duty of care, it is necessary to demonstrate the care provided fell below the minimum standard of any reasonable body of other medical practitioners practising in the same field of expertise. This test is called “The Bolam Test” after the case of Bolam v Friern Hospital Management Committee [1957].

In this case it was established that

“a doctor is not guilty of negligence if he has acted in accordance with a practice accepted as proper by a responsible body of medical men skilled in that particular art…. Putting it the other way round, a doctor is not negligent, if he is acting in accordance with such a practice, merely because there is a body of opinion which takes a contrary view.”

This means that if a medical practitioner can show she acted in a manner, which a responsible body of medical opinion would deem to be correct, then a defence will be established. There is often more than one way to treat a particular condition and it is not enough to show a different practitioner would have treated the patient differently.

This principle was developed further in the case of Bolitho v City and Hackney Health Authority [1997]. This case established that any responsible body of medical opinion must stand up to logical analysis. Therefore medical practitioners must follow a body of opinion, which is responsible, reasonable and stands up to logical analysis.

Evidence is obtained from an independent medical expert witness for the Court to determine whether the particular treatment used would be supported by a responsible body of medical opinion.

3. Causation

The Claimant must show the negligent treatment caused the injury in question and that if the correct treatment had been received the injury would not have been suffered. This must be established on the balance of probabilities i.e. it is more probable than not (51%. 49% would not be sufficient) that if the correct treatment were provided, the injury would not have been suffered.

Again, evidence from an independent medical expert witness is obtained to prove causation.

In the case of Bolitho mentioned above, a two-year-old boy was admitted to the defendant’s hospital suffering from respiratory problems. The following day he suffered two short episodes of further respiratory problems. On each occasion a doctor was called but did not attend. Following the first episode, the child recovered. Following the second, the child appeared to recover but half an hour later collapsed due to a failure of his respiratory system and suffered a cardiac arrest. As a result of which he suffered severe brain damage, and subsequently, after proceedings were issued, died. It was agreed the cardiac arrest would have been prevented if after the respiratory problem the child had been intubated. The defendant admitted failure to attend was a breach of duty, but argued that even if the doctor had attended, she would not have arranged for the child to be intubated, and therefore the breach of duty did not cause the injury. The Claimant argued that in such a hypothetical situation a failure to intubate would have been negligent. The Judge in this case heard expert evidence on behalf of the Defendant, which stated it would not have been appropriate to intubate. The Court thus held a decision that not to intubate would have been in accordance with a reasonable and responsible body of medical opinion, and therefore the Claimant had failed to prove the breach of duty had caused the injury.

4. Loss or Injury

Once a duty of care has been established, that there was a breach of that duty, and that this caused injury or loss, then compensation may be recoverable.

A Claimant can claim compensation for pain, suffering and loss of amenity, sometimes referred to as “general damages”. In addition, a Claimant can claim reasonable out-of-pocket expenses incurred as a result of the negligently caused injury. These are sometimes referred to as “special damages”.

A Claimant can claim for past and future expenses and this is presented in the form of a Schedule. It is for you, the Claimant, to firstly prove the loss of expenses incurred, and secondly, that the loss of expense was caused by the negligently caused injury as opposed to unrelated factors. The first issue is generally a matter of documentary evidence, receipts to prove the cost of the items purchased. The second issue is generally a matter for medical evidence and we rely upon the medical experts to confirm that the loss or expense was reasonable, and caused by the negligently caused injury rather than by unrelated factors.

Here are some examples of the types of losses you may be able to recover:

• Loss of earnings, past and future
• Medical treatment costs, past and future
• Aides and equipment
• Travel expenses and prescription charges
• Care and assistance provided professionally, or by family or friends

Anne Dickinson is a qualified solicitor at Ascot Lawyers Personal Injury, Clinical Negligence, Personal Injury Ascot Lawyers specializing in personal injury and Clinical Negligence at Ascot Lawyers clinical negligence

She has over 6 years experience dealing with all types of claim including road traffic accidents, accidents at work, accidents in a public place, product liability and medical negligence claims. She is a member of APIL.

Article Source: http://EzineArticles.com/?expert=Anne_Dickinson

Medical malpractice refers to the failure of a healthcare provider to provide accepted standards of service. If the healthcare provider deviates in any respect from the norms of treating a patient, it is termed as medical malpractice. This failure or deviation is very dangerous for a patient as it can cause injury to him, or in extreme cases lead to the patient’s death. This means that medical practice is nothing but professional negligence on the part of the healthcare provider.

Just like in other lawsuits, even in medical malpractice lawsuits there is a plaintiff and defendant. The plaintiff will be the patient, while the defendant is the healthcare provider, who can be a doctor, physician, therapist or dentist. In case the malpractice led to the patient’s demise, the plaintiff’s role is assumed by an individual who is the administrator or executor of the deceased patient’s estate.

Even a hospital, clinic or medical center can be sued for medical malpractice. Depending on the gravity of the case, managed care organizations or medical corporations can be defendants too. Even nurses can be liable as previous cases have shown us that non-physicians cannot be protected for just following orders.

A medical malpractice lawsuit should prove that the medical treatment or care that was supposed to be given or undertaken by the healthcare provider was not done so. In addition, it must also be proven that the healthcare provider failed to perform his or her duties according to the prescribed standards. The case should further prove that the duties performed by the healthcare provider were breached. All this can be done by sworn testimony or proved results of obvious errors.

Medical malpractice cases are similar to tort cases. The plaintiff’s attorney first files the lawsuit. The time between the filing and the trial is then used for sharing information between the concerned parties. This period involves depositions, interrogations and requests for documents. If the two parties cannot come to a mutual understanding, the case then proceeds for trial.

In the trial, it is important to have expert witnesses who should have enough training, education and knowledge about the specific medical issue. It is only then they can qualify as experts witnesses. If the plaintiff wins the case, he can be awarded punitive as well as compensatory damages.

About Author: Pauline Go is an online leading expert in medical industry. She also offers top quality finance tips like:

Spot Fake Doctor Note, Find Medical Malpractice Lawyer, Find a Dentist

Article Source: http://EzineArticles.com/?expert=Pauline_Go

Today, the circumstances are a little different. With the evolution of technology and scientific discovery, our knowledge of the human body and its processes are becoming increasingly accurate. We can determine what action to take in different situations in order to ensure the most profitable outcome. Despite these improvements, birth injuries still occur. These can be caused by a number of different things, ranging from inadequate medical care to natural pregnancy complications.

Some of the most common are as follows:

Abnormal position refers to the way the baby is positioned in the mother’s womb. While doctors can try to reposition the baby, the process can incur even more complications, like tangling the umbilical cord, which can eventually strangle the baby.

Large babies, those that way 8.5 pounds or more, can cause injury to the mother during birth. In some cases, the baby is too large for the birth canal, and in others, the baby can rip or tear flesh, forcing an operation to be done in order to retrieve the baby. This can also occur when the baby is too mature and has been in the womb for a several days beyond the expected delivery date.

Abnormal birthing presentation, the case in which the baby comes out the wrong way (buttocks or feet first), is also another cause of birth injury. In most instances, the doctor can detect or predict the likely outcome of this occurrence in order to prevent injury, but it’s not always the case.

These examples are only three of the possible causes of birth injury. More often than not, though, the fault isn’t on the mother’s genetic makeup, like her size or the nature of her labor. It is sometimes a result of malpractice, a doctor who is does not handle with care or who ignores vital signs that could prevent such injuries from occurring.

When this happens, it’s important to know that there are people who can help. If you or someone you know has been the victim of birth injury due to medical malpractice, consult this website for more information on how you can protect yourself: http://www.birth-injurylawyers.com/

Joseph Devine
Article Source: http://EzineArticles.com/?expert=Joseph_Devine

Any injury caused to a patient as a direct result of the neglect or incompetence on the doctor’s part is termed medical malpractice. Instances of medical malpractice are seen whenever a patient – without justification – suffers prolonged or increased suffering, either because of a delay in diagnosis or because of a faulty diagnosis or treatment. In serious cases, this can even lead to lifelong debility or death of the patient.

If you are a victim of medical malpractice, you have put up with preventable pain because of your doctor’s fault. You are thus entitled to claim compensation to make up for your suffering. Remember, however, that to be able to do so, you will have to prove that your doctor was at fault.

This is a four-step guide to help you file a winning medical malpractice claim:

Step 1: Determine whether the doctor was at fault. The only way to do this is to thoroughly research the information available on your specific medical condition. Remember, you are dealing with a subject that your doctor knows more about than you do. To prove that he is guilty you will need to:

• Speak to specialists

• Refer to medical literature

• Talk to other patients with a similar condition

Step 2: Find out if you have a valid claim. This is not necessarily the same as the above. For a claim to be valid, you should have suffered a reasonable amount of distress. What’s more, you should be in a position to prove that your distress was caused due to your doctor’s mistake. An inconsequential delay, for instance, that caused you slight inconvenience, will not constitute a valid claim.

Step 3: Collect incriminating evidence. In a medical malpractice case, evidence will generally consist of your medical reports along with records of all the treatment prescribed by your doctor.

Step 4: Hire a lawyer. A competent lawyer will help you to handle complicated legal formalities and, if it comes to that, to fight your case in court.

Diana Joseph has an in-depth knowledge in dealing with in injury claims. She has written numerous articles on injury claims issues, particularly those involving car accident and other topics of claims. Please contact her for further information on claims related issues.

Article Source: http://EzineArticles.com/?expert=Diana_Joseph

Is it malpractice if a doctor fails to inform a patient that their MRI result is abnormal?

Is it a departure from good and accepted practice if a radiologist misreads a chest x-ray, that in hindsight shows a malignant mass that turns out to be lung cancer?

Is it wrong for a doctor to put surgical clips across the common bile duct when doing a laparoscopic gallbladder removal?

What do you think of a doctor who takes cash for a procedure, does a “half-baked” job, and refuses to return the money to the patient? Would it sound better if I told you the doctor gave up his license to practice, abandoned his patients, and now each of his patients with “sub-standard” treatment must get corrective treatment at the going rate, which is double or triple than what this doctor originally charged?

What about the case of a man who collapses at home, is rushed to the emergency room, has emergency surgery on his intestines and he comes out of surgery needing to have his hand amputated days later.

Maybe this one will catch your attention:

A woman goes into the hospital for a total knee replacement. The surgery goes well. In the recovery room a drain in the knee is attached to a tube for drainage. Unfortunately, the nurse who attached the drain tube attached it to an oxygen line instead of a suction line. Instead of fluid being pulled out of the knee space, air was being pumped INTO the knee. Since the knee was a closed space, the air blew into the space directly under the skin and muscles, travelled up her entire leg, inflating her leg like a balloon, then going up to her belly, causing her belly to become as large as a pregnant woman’s. The doctors were eventually alerted to this inexplicable condition and rush the woman into the operating room where they had to perform emergency surgery to find out why her belly was inexplicably becoming larger and larger.

Immediately upon opening her belly, a huge amount of air was released- like a balloon that is quickly deflated. Turns out, there was nothing wrong with her belly. Working backwards, the doctors were able to figure out that the drainage tube had air going into her knee which then travelled up to her belly, causing her to look like a hot-air balloon. The failure to recognize the mistake led this woman to have emergency abdominal surgery–something that she did not need. Her anticipated hospital stay of one day turned into a week-long stay with complications following the belly surgery.

What about the man who had eye surgery to repair a drooping eyelid and came out of surgery being blind? Turns out that the eye surgeon cut his optic nerve during surgery, and only realized the horrible mistake a day later- too late to fix the problem. The man is now permanently blind.

What common recurring theme is found in each of these cases?

Carelessness by a doctor or nurse. Naturally, the doctors and nurses did not intentionally make these mistakes and errors, yet they occurred because of inattention and carelessness. Each of the cases discussed above

Gerry Oginski is an experienced medical malpractice and personal injury trial attorney practicing law in Brooklyn, Bronx, Queens, New York, Staten Island, Nassau & Suffolk. He has tirelessly represented injured victims in all types of medical malpractice and injury cases for over 19 years. As a solo practitioner he is able to devote 100% of his time to each individual client. A client is never a file number in his office.

Take a look at Gerry’s website http://www.oginski-law.com and read his free special reports on malpractice and accident law. Read actual testimony of real doctors in medical malpractice cases. Learn answers to your legal questions. We have over 200 FAQs to the most interesting legal questions. Read about his success stories. Read the latest injury and malpractice news. I guarantee there’s something for you. See Gerry’s website at http://www.oginski-law.com Call him at 516-487-8207.

Also, go over to http://www.medicalmalpracticetutorial.blogspot.com for Gerry’s free instructional videos on malpractice & accident law.

Article Source: http://EzineArticles.com/?expert=Gerry_Oginski

Victims of medical malpractice who are injured for life, such as those who are maimed, have an obvious reason to file a lawsuit. These people already know that since they have suffered from medical malpractice they should find a local malpractice attorney office to claim their due. After all, these victims are very likely either working two jobs to pay off their mounting medical bills that bad doctor caused them, or they are too injured to work. Many of these victims are at home in bed, in pain, and worried about how their bills are going to be paid.

Other victims of medical malpractice include the family and friends of the person who was killed due to a doctor’s negligence. These persons are left to pay the medical bills of their loved one, as well as pay costly funeral expenses to put the original victim to rest.

Many victims of medical malpractice suffer primarily mental or financial anguish. These people are the lucky victims we get to meet, and we believe they have been appointed to stand up for what the injured, the maimed, and the dead cannot: Fight against medical malpractice so that more lives are not ruined or lost.

Your medical malpractice lawsuit is a tool to help refocus American doctors on what’s important. Hit their pocket book and see that they think about their patients and not the golf ball. If you have a medical malpractice case on your hands, hand it to competent local medical malpractice attorneys who see the bigger picture.

Andre Zayas is a professionally syndicated author.

Attorneys

Article Source: http://EzineArticles.com/?expert=Andre_Zayas

Side Effects and Regulations

But there is a darker side to prescription meds. As new drugs are invented and new chemicals synthesized, people become increasingly dependent on substances which are, quite literally, foreign. Though chemicals in a given medicine may boost resistance to asthma attacks, they may also have other, unintended effects. Sometimes these side effects are revealed during laboratory trials to be nothing more than minor inconveniences; other times, severe side effects are not detected – or even covered up – until thousands of unsuspecting people have been hurt. Although the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) regulates the safety of pharmaceuticals, it is far from perfect; the recent Baxter heparin contamination scandal demonstrates this fact.

Pharmaceutical Error

Another concern with prescription meds is how targeted and specific they are. Because these drugs are often very potent, only patients with certain conditions can safely take them – and then only in carefully measured doses. Unfortunately, given the complexity of modern medicine and science, few laypeople know very much about their own prescriptions. We rely on doctors and pharmacists to provide us with the correct medicine, in the correct amounts, for the correct diagnosis. If errors happen at any time in the process, the effects could be disastrous.

Safety concerns do not stop there – recent criticism of the FDA’s drug labeling system has spurred the agency to propose a series of changes intended to make labels easier to read and understand, particularly for pregnant women. Of course, pregnant women are not the only ones at risk. Elderly patients, many of whom have trouble with their vision, are also at a high risk of making a deadly mistake. The similar appearance of many pills also contributes to the confusion; only an especially careful person would notice the difference.

Prescription medicine mix-ups are not confined to the home. In many cases, doctors and nurses in busy hospitals have been known to administer the wrong drugs to a patient. In others, a drug may be prescribed without taking into account a patient’s health conditions or drug allergies.

Protecting Yourself

Ultimately the best defense against taking the wrong drug is a healthy dose of caution. Never assume that each refill of your prescription has been filled correctly – check carefully to make sure the new batch of pills looks identical to the last batch. A number of online resources can help you make this comparison. Read labels thoroughly – especially if you are taking a prescription for the first time. While it may be tedious, you may be glad you did.

For more information on safety concerns with prescription medicines, visit http://www.habush.com for resources provided by the Milwaukee medical malpractice lawyers of Habush, Habush, & Rottier, S.C.

Joseph Devine
Article Source: http://EzineArticles.com/?expert=Joseph_Devine

Unfortunately there are cases in which a physician does not care for their patient in the best possible way through neglect. This may be intentional or unintentional. Either way medical malpractice is not to be tolerated and compensation for the pain caused through this injury is required. Legal malpractice is quite often the breach of a contract between the attorney and the client that leads to an injury.

No matter the form of malpractice at anytime that a client or person is injured at the hands of another’s negligence there should be a case filed for compensation for all grievances. There are many times that a person may lose a job or even experience loss of life and these losses lead to much pain and suffering.

Money cannot take away pain and suffering or bring a loved one back after accidental death, but it can help a family to provide payments for bills and other expenses. No one should have to be unfortunate enough to be injured at the hands of another due to insufficient care by the person. It is a pure shame that this even occurs on a daily basis.

Though this is a fact in our lives we can be thankful and be filled with hope for the proper treatment to be dished out from a medical malpractice injury attorney. You can find a malpractice injury attorney through the phone book or by searching online. You can set up a free consultation so you can begin to put a plan in action in order to receive compensation and to move on with your life for the future.

The Law Offices of Bruce M. Robinson concentrate on providing for the needs of injured victims. This includes all manner of medical malpractice, from medical malpractice, birth trauma and defects to serious automobile accidents and products liability claims. Bruce M. Robinson aggressively and competently represents the needs of injured victims.

Article Source: http://EzineArticles.com/?expert=Bruce_Robinson

Case Study

Leon Baker suffered a heart attack after his doctors administered the wrong drug during surgery. He filed a claim alleging medical negligence, which resulted in the award of £200,000 in cash. However, not all claims result in such hefty compensation amounts. In fact, the win rate for medical malpractice claims is much lower than that for road or workplace accidents. This is because in a majority of cases patients do not understand the complex procedures that are involved in filing such a claim.

Criticism

The Personal Injury Valuation Handbook estimates that one in five of medical negligence claims involve death. However, statistics do not reveal the real cost for the patient as well as his or her family. Medical negligence not only causes irreparable physical damage to the patient but also leaves permanent mental scars. Moreover, the process of filing a claim is time-consuming and complex. Yet, some argue against the same laws that protect against faulty treatment. Here are some of the arguments:

• “Medical malpractice laws increase litigation and encourage fraudulent claims.” Not true. Research shows that the risk of fraud is minimal though not zero. The real problem, according to Tom Barker, author of The Medical Malpractice Myth, is too much medical malpractice. In fact, research has shown that a majority of such cases go unreported. Laws are necessary to safeguard the interests of the patient and make medical professionals responsible for their actions.

• “Some medical operations come with known risks for which doctors cannot be held guilty.” AND “It is not always possible to determine if the patient has adequately followed the doctor’s instructions.”

These arguments arise from a misunderstanding of the law. Medical malpractice works on the principle of causation, which means that it is not enough to say that the treatment was substandard or that it did not work. Patients also have to prove a cause-effect relationship between the medical professional’s poor performance and an undesirable result. This involves the role of an “expert witness” who provides expert medical testimony. The final judgement depends on whether the doctor did something inappropriate that most people in the medical profession would not have done.

Should I File a Claim?

Often, patients are unsure about filing a claim for compensation, as it is difficult to determine if something has gone wrong BECAUSE of poor treatment. If you feel that faulty treatment or misdiagnosis is to blame for your poor health, speak to another medical professional immediately.

If there is some evidence of medical malpractice, then contact a solicitor immediately, as all claims usually have a time limit ranging from one to four years. A qualified solicitor with relevant experience is the best person to guide you through the process of filing a claim.

Diana Joseph has an in-depth knowledge in dealing with injury claims. She has written numerous articles on injury claims issues, particularly those involving car accident and other topics of claims. Please contact her for further information on claims related issues.

Article Source: http://EzineArticles.com/?expert=Diana_Joseph