In one of two ways:

1. He fails to recognize the signs and symptoms of an impending heart attack, or an ongoing heart attack, or

2. He fails to properly interpret the tests that were taken.

Let’s talk about #1 above. Typically, a patient will go to a hospital emergency room with complaints of belly or chest pain. The pain could be radiating from the chest to the shoulder or arm. The patient might be sweaty and clammy. They could be experiencing crushing chest pain. The problem arises when the patient’s complaints are not typical for what is commonly seen in a heart attack victim.

The words “heart attack” are a misnomer. What do I mean? The doctors refer to a heart attack as a “myocardial infarction.” It basically means one of two things: (1) That part of your heart muscle has died, or (2) The blood vessel(s) that supply the heart with blood and oxygen has been cut off, causing part of your heart to starve and possibly die.

When we hear that someone has had heart bypass surgery, it usually means that one or more of the blood vessels that supply the heart with blood and oxygen has been restricted or obstructed, and surgery was done to allow blood to ‘bypass’ or go around the obstruction.

Sometimes when a patient presents to a doctor or an emergency room with an upset stomach or back pain, the doctor may not correctly interpret the symptoms, and may incorrectly diagnose the patient as having a gastric problem (a problem with their digestive system) and not a cardiac problem. The problem arises when the patient returns home and hours or days later, they die as a result of a ‘heart attack’.

Let’s discuss #2 above, where the doctor incorrectly interprets the EKG or a stress test, and thinks it’s normal, when in reality it is not. Again, the patient is discharged home with instructions on diet and exercise and to follow up with their doctor or cardiologist in a few weeks. Needless to say, the patient returns home and days, weeks, or even months later, the patient dies of a heart attack.

What does a New York medical malpractice attorney look for when evaluating a claim of “failure to diagnose a heart attack?” Your attorney needs to know the following:

1. If you had been correctly diagnosed at the time you had symptoms, what treatment would you have had? Would you have had a stent put in your cardiac artery or vein (a stent is a device designed to open up a clogged artery or vein, and is put in using a catheter, instead of having major open-heart surgery)? Would you have received nitroglycerin to help ease the flow of blood and reduce your pain?

2. Would you have had elective open-heart bypass surgery? By elective, I mean that you have had time to discuss the surgery with your doctor and learn about the risks, benefits and alternatives to the surgery. Sometimes when a patient has had a heart attack, tests might reveal that many of the blood vessels supplying the heart are severely clogged. The patient may then need emergency bypass surgery, and you may not have a chance to discuss any alternatives, as there may not be any at that point.

3. If elective bypass surgery were done, and there was no blood vessel that remained clogged, would you have suffered the heart attack that you ultimately did? If the answer is no, then your potential malpractice case just got stronger. In other words, if your injuries were preventable if you had been timely diagnosed, you would not be in the condition you’re in now. That’s very significant and important.

Recently, I had the privilege of representing a young man whose cardiac condition was misdiagnosed. He had gone to a hospital with complaints of chest pain that was incorrectly diagnosed. He was told to follow-up with his cardiologist to address his ongoing complaints of chest pain. Three months later, this young man suffered a devastating heart attack, killing off a large part of his heart muscle. When the records were reviewed by cardiologists (heart doctors) we learned that the doctors initially misread the diagnostic tests that were performed, and missed the key opportunity to perform elective heart bypass surgery. As a result of that failure, months went by where the young man continued to complain of chest pain. The heart attack has destroyed this man’s life. Unfortunately for him, his heart attack was totally preventable.

A heart attack may be preventable. Let your lawyer know what symptoms, if any, you had when you saw your doctor and what was done for you. Tell your attorney the details of what went on in the emergency room and what tests they performed to find out if you had or were having a heart attack. Prevention is always best. Knowing that a heart attack could have been prevented is second best.

Gerry Oginski is an experienced New York medical malpractice and personal injury trial attorney and practices exclusively in the State of New York. He has tirelessly represented injured victims in all types of medical malpractice and injury cases in the last 19 years. As a solo practitioner he is able to devote 100% of his time to each individual client. A client is never a file number in his office.

Take a look at Gerry’s website http://www.oginski-law.com and read his free special reports on malpractice and accident law. Read actual testimony of real doctors in medical malpractice cases. Learn answers to your legal questions. We have over 200 FAQs to the most interesting legal questions. Read about his success stories. Read the latest injury and malpractice news. I guarantee there’s something for you. http://www.oginski-law.com 516-487-8207

Also, take a look at Gerry’s FREE NY Medical Malpractice video tutorials at http://medicalmalpracticetutorial.blogspot.com

Article Source: http://EzineArticles.com/?expert=Gerry_Oginski

* Asking for a medical bill each time you see a doctor or facility – EVEN if your insurance is paying for it;
* Save all prescription bills and bottles. Sometimes a pile of pill bottles in front of a jury works better than words in describing your ordeal ;
* Keep a separate chart/list with dates, amounts of medical bills, and purchases of medication or equipment. This amount may be greater than just medical bills because you could be buying such things as heating pads, sleeping aids, supportive devices, etc. Your lawyer may use this list to show the other side or the jury how much trouble you have in dealing with your injuries.

Even though your attorney will obtain copies of your medical bills and records directly from the medical facilities, your documents will provide a crucial double-check process that assures your claim is settled for maximum value. Your attorney cannot demand compensation for bills he does not know about. Attorneys will tell you that all to frequently a facility will only send them a portion of your bills because they may have switched outsourcing billing agencies for example.

Another critical task that you, as the client are responsible for is organizing and documenting how your life was affected by the accident. You want to do the following:

* Keep any written statements you made or someone else gave, whether to the police, a doctor, or an insurance investigator. If you do not have copies of these statements, at least make a note of you remembering or seeing a statement given.
* Keep all letters to/from insurance adjusters, including emails, and any business cards that anyone has handed you.
* Keep a journal/diary of how your life has been affected by the accident. List the things you cannot do now and things you can still do but with pain. Describe how your day is with pain or embarrassing incidents that happen because of your injuries. Keep each entry short and to the point. This helps your attorney to craft a compelling argument for your pain and suffering damages. If you do not write this stuff down as it happens, you will forget all the little things and will not be able to tell your attorney how your life was really affected.
* Keep all proof of your car’s property damage. This includes photographs, repair estimates, or repair bills. The damage to your car is usually very compelling evidence of how severe the accident was.
* Locate or obtain a copy of your insurance policy. Your attorney will want to review your policies policy to determine if you have additional insurance coverage available.

ABOUT THE AUTHOR: David Brauns is an experienced personal injury trial attorney practicing in Atlanta, Georgia. He began his career working for insurance companies with the intention of learning how they defended serious personal injury cases so that he could one day start his own law firm and oppose them. Unlike other personal injury lawyers, David only takes a select number of cases each year to ensure that he is strategically litigating each of his clients’ cases towards maximum value.

Visit http://www.braunslaw.com to learn more about your case and how to hire the right lawyer. David created a website focused on you, the potential client with lots of questions about your case, and not some brochure website that just talks about his firm. Read http://www.braunslaw.com now, before you retain a lawyer.

David promises you will learn something that improves either your case or your relationship with your attorney. Or, you can call David at (770) 783-1388.

Article Source: http://EzineArticles.com/?expert=David_Brauns

The Nursing Home Reform Act of 1987 was created in response to an alarming number of neglect and abuse charges that surfaced during the 1980’s. Congress passed the Act in conjunction with the Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act (OBRA). This law protects residents’ rights to be fully informed of services and their charges and participate in their own care, both in receiving adequate and appropriate care and the ability to refuse that care if so desired. Residents also have the rights to privacy and confidentiality, to make independent choices, to have security in their own possessions, to complain, the ability to have visits, and a basic entitlement to dignity, respect, and freedom.

Abuse in nursing homes is usually easier to spot than neglect, simply because abuse normally has physical manifestations. Broken bones, cuts, scars, abrasions, and bed sores are all clues of abuse. Neglect is more subtle and difficult to spot. Potential examples of neglect include insufficient food, water, and bathing opportunities, failure to properly assist an elderly person who needs assistance eating, drinking, or bathing, and failure to supply adequate supplies such as soap or shampoo. If you suspect your loved one has been abused or neglected, it is recommended to speak with them to find out as much information as possible. Overall mood and cleanliness, as well as the general condition of the room and nursing home, should also be observed. Complaints should be filed at the state level as well as contacting the police department where the abuse occurred.

Neglect and abuse in nursing homes is a serious offense. The elderly depend on quality, assisted living when they cannot adequately care for themselves. If you are interested in learning more, this nursing home abuse website can provide more information.

Joseph Devine

Article Source: http://EzineArticles.com/?expert=Joseph_Devine

Nursing Home Abuse Warning Signs

The obvious signs of Nursing Home Abuse are injuries that you can actually see. For example, if your loved one is constantly developing new cuts, scratches and bruises it is possible that they are a victim of Nursing Home Abuse. If you notice the consistent appearance of physical injuries, it is important to investigate the issue immediately. Ask your loved one if everything is alright and if they are being mistreated. Many times, the resident may not want to discuss their injuries, so you must then follow up with the supervisor, attending doctor as well as analyze the residents charts. Once you have investigated the injuries, it is time for you to decide whether you need to take the appropriate steps to ensure the safety of your loved one and report the abuse to the proper authorities.

Nursing Home Neglect Warning Signs

Nursing Home Neglect is more difficult to diagnose, as the physical signs are not as obvious as the signs of physical abuse. Signs of such neglect are bad hygiene, weight loss, dirty facilities (bathroom, dirty sheets, dirty underwear) and bed sores. All of the above warning signs could be due to non-neglect issues, but should be thoroughly investigated at the time of their discovery. Many elder care residents rely on the nursing home to ensure they are staying hydrated (plenty of water), fed with a well balanced diet, bathed and exercised. The above warning signs could be a sign that the nursing home may be neglecting their responsibility to take care of your loved one. Much like the appropriate action steps required of you in potential physical abuse situations, in a potential neglect situation you need to investigate all avenues while ensuring the safety of your loved one.

First and foremost, if you feel your loved one is being abused or neglected in a nursing home, you need to ensure their safety. After your investigation of the abuse with the elder care facility administrator and attending doctor you should tell the patients primary care physician about your suspicion of abuse as well as your family and report the abuse to Police. Elder abuse is a crime with both criminal and civil penalties. Your next step is to protect your rights by contacting a qualified nursing home abuse attorney. A nursing abuse attorney will have experience handling these types of cases and will know what to look for to aid your civil case against the facility. There are a lot of factors that go into this type of lawsuit and it is not a battle that can be fought effectively without proper representation.

For more information regarding this topic, contact the Oklahoma Law Firm of Atkins & Markoff.

If you have a legal question for an Oklahoma City Personal Injury Lawyer regarding your rights, give Atkins & Markoff a call; if they can’t help you with your problem, they’ll find someone who can. This article, which is not meant to be legal advice, may be republished providing all of the resource links remain intact.

Article Source: http://EzineArticles.com/?expert=Andrew_Sarski

Indeed the FSA has just recently been given a dossier of evidence against unscrupulous insurers by Trade unions and claimant lawyers. Their concern regards the behavior of said insurers who deal directly with accident victims and the allegations that they are putting pressure on victims to waive their right to compensation or to settle claims for a lesser amount that they actually should.

This pressure and behavior is known in the industry as ‘third-party capture’ whereby insurers try to settle the claims of injured people before they had the chance to take independent legal advice. The trade union, Unite, included a case in the dossier where where insurance company Zurich offered £4,000 in ‘full and final settlement’, only for the case to be settled last November for £35,000.

Also in the dossier are findings by The Association of Personal Injury Lawyers’ (Apil) and amongst their more worrying cases is one in particular- where a claim on behalf of bereaved parents who lost their three children in a road traffic accident was settled last year for £60,00 but was originally offered to be settled by Quinn Direct for £21,000.

Unite and Apil are but only two companies that have expressed concern in the dossier about insurance company representatives’ cold-calling ‘third-party’ victims after an accident. In some cases, the representatives go a step further and even visit an accident victim’s house in the aftermath of a car crash. Insurance companies however will rebut the allegations by claiming that their services are designed to be proactive which would mean getting in contact with potential claimants as soon as possible after an accident. Clearly however, going one step beyond and urging settlement as soon as possible without thorough legal advice is unacceptable.

In light of the dossier, the FSA will have to decide if accident victims are truly losing out and the evidence seems to suggest that they are. Unite in particular has provided cases where victims do not know the true value of the claims and that they are being told they do not have a good case when in fact they do.

The entire investigation may prove to be a vicious circle with the insurance industry raising its hands to practicing ‘third-party capture’ on a frequent basis, but only as part of a logical business model. In their defense, the pro-active response is simply a way to address escalating costs of processing claims. They are in effect bypassing the expensive intermediary-the lawyer.

Saurav is an author of several articles pertaining to No Win No Fee, Compensation Claims, Personal Injury Claims and other legal articles.

Article Source: http://EzineArticles.com/?expert=Saurav_Dutt